Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of a Meeting of the <br />North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission <br />April 7, 2008 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Dailey said there were a number of questions sent over today by a resident who is not going to be <br />able to attend on Thursday which every member of Council will be getting. If people have questions <br />that are not going to be able to be at the meeting or questions that will come up after the meeting, <br />contact their members of Council. He encourages all residents to let their feelings known; tell their <br />elected officials what they think. Again, ultimately, it is going to come down to what the voters want <br />anyhow. <br /> <br />Mr. Baxter said that much of what can be done could bring the finest facility on the west side of <br />Cleveland if we wanted to spend the money for it. It will be interesting to see what people want: a <br />good rink, or larger tennis courts, and all of that being fine and good. However, the question remains: <br />can we afford it; does it make sense? There won’t be answers to that if it cannot be accommodated <br />financially for whatever is wanted. How you satisfy people or satisfy what they want is going to be <br />interesting. It’s just an observation. Mr. Mahoney said it was a good observation. The answer is that <br />the Administration wants this to pass in November, and they’ve put together a plan for Council to <br />accept, and perhaps ultimately the voters will accept. Because if it’s a plan that doesn’t have what the <br />majority of residents want, then it won’t pass. <br /> <br />Mr. Scarl said that it’s basically not what the Administration wants but what surrounding communities <br />have. He was sure ours would be lacking what Westlake or Fairview or Strongsville has, but overall it <br />must be something that would be comparable to the other cities; otherwise, why would you be <br />building it. Mr. Dailey said that there is a breakdown: if someone goes to Westlake and sees that a <br />wife is involved in a yoga class, and a child is involved in a learn to swim, and you actually see what <br />the prices are, even though Westlake might have quite the facility, most of those programs that you go <br />to besides open swim are extra money. We find it to be pretty much the same with all the communities <br />that are around town. The only rec center that is drastically lower than any Mr. Dailey has seen is <br />Middleburg Heights, and he doesn’t know how they do it, but they do an amazing job. Ted belongs to <br />the facility, and his membership is $230 a year. The City of Westlake brings in $500 for a family of <br />four. Middleburg Heights is not quite 20% the City of North Olmsted. Plus, they have a nice tax <br />th <br />base. Just so you know, Mr. Dailey continued, what we will be looking at will be a 1/8 of 1% <br />income tax bump. So, currently, we have 2-1/8%, which for a family making $60,000 a year, you’re <br />looking at maybe $67 a year. <br /> <br />We understand that an ice rink is very expensive to build and maintain. Very few publicly funded ice <br />rinks are being built any more, and the ones that were built were built around the same time as each <br />other, and now the ones that are being built are all privately funded. Even the City of Avon is looking <br />to get a private entity to come out and build that, but the City isn’t looking to fund it at this point in <br />time, much like what we saw in the City of Strongsville, which is so successful. <br /> <br />Ms. Nader noted that there is no alternate plan, and that there would be escalating maintenance costs <br />just to maintain the Rec Center, so there must be an offset. If there is no new facility, they will pay <br />more. Mr. Mahoney said to follow up, either way, the process the Administration is going to take <br />over the next few weeks and months is a good thing for the City. We all know that the City’s facility <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />