4/7/2008 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of a Meeting of the North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission April 7, 2008 is older and needs some attention, so no matter what comes of this, ultimately the City will benefit because some changes will be made one way or the other. If this is accepted by the voters in November, so be it; if it doesn’t, then at least the debate has begun. He can’t believe that in ’09 if this isn’t successful, that some changes won’t be taken by the Administration or by Council itself. Mr. Lasko agreed with Mr. Mahoney from the standpoint that from the Schools’ perspective about using this facility or what the relationship might be of a contractual nature if in fact this thing is constructed. Just looking back at the ballot issue that the schools had put on the ballot in November of whatever the year was that included the proposal to build a new Middle School at the Pine site, and it was promoted heavily, it was advocated heavily; and yet the voters for whatever reason in their collective judgment and wisdom said no, in effect, we don’t want the Middle School down at the Pine site. The inference was that they would prefer to see the campus that is out by the High School where the current Middle School is be developed into a bigger, better, broader campus that would envision both a Middle School and High School. I think that’s the message that came through loud and clear. The schools have not done anything, although the wheels are turning very gradually now to try and develop a proposal in some yet undetermined time in the future for capital improvements. It is not there yet. It is in the very early discussion stage, but it is being influenced greatly by the election of about two years ago. Mr. Lasko cannot help but believe that depending upon whether, again, the voters in their collective judgment and wisdom choose to accept or reject this proposal, assuming it gets to the ballot, nevertheless, progress isn’t going to stand still. There will be, just by the natural evolution of things, an alternative. It’s just that at the moment there is no alternative envisioned or a fallback plan. Sooner or later, it is just the course of human events that there will be, Mr. Lasko would suspect, another plan. If you stand still, you lose; you fall behind. You can’t stand still. Mr. Dailey said that there never was money put aside every year in a slush fund for the Rec Center. It was just the way it was set up here by the city fathers back in the ‘70s and it’s just going to continue on that way; unfortunately, we are the ones that have to fix it. Mr. Groden said that, putting the cart way before the horse, if this does go on the ballot in November, what will that process cost the City? Mr. Dailey said that the City cannot be in the business of promoting this issue one way or another. It must come from private funds or through a citizens group to champion the cause. If there is something on the ballot, it’s just a negligible cost, because of the fact that there will be a vote anyhow; the City is not going for a special election, anyway. He did not know how much; but it would be a nominal amount. He would envision something similar to what was done for the Library, that there would be a “Friends of the Rec Committee” for lack of a better term, out there to raise funds to promote the issue. Mr. Groden asked if there were any other questions Mr. DiSalvo addressed Mr. Dailey, saying that if this (the vote) fails, the Commissioner still had a rink and swimming pools to operate; ice must be booked six months to a year in advance. He couldn’t just say, “Sorry.” Mr. Dailey said that he understands this; the Rec Center will still be open, Page 12