Laserfiche WebLink
Recreation Commission Meeting <br />Page Seven <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo asked if there were any questions from the Commission members. Ms. Jones asked <br />if someone staffs the ticket booth late at night for over-the-hill hockey. The Commissioner stated <br />that whoever the closing supervisor is will be physically there rather than in the office. <br /> <br />Mr. Limpert asked if there would be a cost trade off as to card swiping for who's in the building <br />and who's not. If we're paying $7-$9 an hour, the Recreation would eventually be spending <br />thousands of dollars instead of some sort of bar code I.D. so that the Recreation staff would <br />actually know who's coming into the building. Would that seem to be an advantageous trade-off <br />as opposed to someone manning the ticket booth? Mr. Gareau said he liked the idea that there <br />should be someone around, especially during odd hours of the day. If the Recreation Center <br />allows some groups to enter because they are known, before long everyone will be coming in <br />unsupervised. Someone walking around the Complex is, itself, the deterrent. Mr. Limpert said <br />that limited staffing, e.g., for an all-night party, puts two people in the pool area and one in the <br />ticket booth. With so many dollar demands, could the time be played smarter? Mr. DiSalvo's <br />concerns are that there should be someone at the ticket booth at all times for a cash exchanges. <br />Once money exchanges are over at the ticket booth, rounds will be made to let staff presence <br />known. Mr. Limpert proposed that, perhaps, some money saved at the ticket booth would <br />provide for a video camera running for a 24-hour targeted time frame. If no one reports a wallet <br />or other valuables missing, re-run the tape. Mr. Gareau stated that once the Commissioner <br />reviews the dynamics of the situation, there might be a lot of money being spent where it shouldn't <br />be. Three people sitting in a ticket booth is not cost effective. Perhaps taking one of those <br />people out to patrol the complex at night, thus reallocating the money, would help. Mr. Gareau <br />further stated that the Commissioner will find that reorganization and reallocation of current <br />staffing is the key. Who knows? The Rec Center might be able to get both: proper staffing as <br />well as the video camera set up. Mr. Gareau's major concern is that people are free to enter and <br />leave the building at will. Some control must be put in place to monitor the situation, maybe <br />something as simple as an access card like a hotel key. Mr. DiSalvo said there's definitely <br />potential for more efficient use of the system, especially in the ticket booth. The training must be <br />better so that everyone's time is maximized for the benefit of the Rec Center. Salary concerns <br />might be one issue, but proper training provides the initial impetus for any kind of longevity. <br />Perhaps longer shifts and more hours per week would give more incentive. There's been a big <br />turnover, and the employees need recognition and attention to keep them interested in their jobs. <br />Mr. Jesse stated that another issue is that, because of the publicity about the security, the <br />Recreation Center has become somewhat of a target. There needs to be an immediate response to <br />this issue. The perpetrators read papers as well. Mr. Baxter said that perhaps programs could be <br />curtailed so that the Recreation Center is not open at 5:00 a.m. or 10:00 p.m. Must the entire <br />facility be open for a small amount of people, given the cost to keep the Center open? Mr. <br />DiSalvo said that, based upon his experience, once you have a program, the people utilizing it <br />want it kept open. The consensus of the Commission was that the Rec employees and <br />Commission should be able to keep all programs running, as long as the programs are making <br />money. A balance is the key. <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />