Laserfiche WebLink
Recreation Commission Meeting <br />July 7, 2003 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />SUB-COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> <br />Public Usage of the Multi-Purpose Rooms <br /> <br />Mr. Gareau reported that the Sub-Committee convened for purposes of discussing meeting rooms <br />at the Rec Center for use by groups, but particularly the lobby. Law Director Dubelko discussed <br />with the Committee some of the issues faced, specifically, the concept under the First Amendment <br />law for public forums, limited public forums and non-public forums. Public are those we <br />understand to be open to free speech distribution of materials, etc. Non-public would be such as <br />an area the Commission uses not open historically to the general public. Mr. Dubelko is of the <br />opinion that the Rec Center might have a limited public forum. Traditionally, the City would not <br />use its Rec Center for issues, but we seemed to have opened it up in the past to allow people to <br />do that such as the League of Women Voters. Mr. Dubelko that the law is scattered among the <br />various judicial districts. Our judicial district leans towards the idea that the City may be able to <br />establish some non-arbitrary standards that the City may be able to use for purposes of using the <br />front lobby or any area where people come and go to use as a forum. Mr. Dubelko's opinion is <br />that we may go so far as to say that altogether we're not going to use the lobby as a forum for <br />people to use it to distribute literature or information; that the City may stop it. Something that <br />the City should approach with caution would be use of the lobby as a public forum on a pending <br />claim and then to tell them no. Mr. Dubelko said that some of the things that could be used to <br />introduce legislation would be to reduce clutter or security purposes. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Sub-Committee is to consider these issues over the course of the next four <br />weeks and return to the Commission with our opinion, to include the Director of Law as well. <br />The Committee did not very far get into the issue of the meeting rooms, but certain rooms will be <br />used only by certain groups for certain reasons and be excluded for all others. There will be <br />rooms like the pool room or ice hockey room that will be limited to people involved with <br />activities associated with planning, organizing or advancing whatever purpose it is at the Rec <br />Center for its individual purpose. It seems that this is the direction the meeting rooms will be <br />taking. <br /> <br />Ms. Hayes asked for questions from the floor; there were none. <br /> <br />Definition of Family <br /> <br />Ms. Jones and Mr. Jesse met on behalf of the Definition of Family Sub-Committee. In his <br />absence, Mr. Kelley presented the Commission with a letter indicating his trip to the Rocky River <br />and Westlake Rec Centers for a "Definition of Family" on their brochures. These were passed <br />among the members for their consideration. Mr. Kelley recommended that the North Olmsted <br />Rec Department adopt a Definition of Family similar to the one of Rocky River. Ms. Jones <br />reported that Westlake only allows four people in a family to buy a pass. Mr. Gareau read: <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />