My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/8/2003 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2003
>
2003 Recreation Commission
>
9/8/2003 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:06 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 9:44:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2003
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
9/8/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recreation Commission Meeting <br />September 8, 2003 <br />Page Eleven <br /> <br /> <br />Baseball Diamond <br /> <br />Ms. Jones asked about the baseball issue. Mr. Disalvo said that the high school does not have <br />the money that the Commission was led to believe, so that project has been shelved. The high <br />school had proposed that Field #4 be made a varsity only field at their expense. They would <br />trade out #1 to another softball field, and the fields would be angled differently. Mr. Jesse said <br />that Dave Perkins and Tom Stein mapped out this proposal, but it has been shelved until next <br />year, and Hot Stove will be willing to help out. <br /> <br />Pool Bleachers <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo reported that, as to the pool bleachers, the Legal Department is in the process of <br />st <br />finalizing the contract that needs to be signed, with a deadline of November 1. Mr. Jesse said <br />that the specs don’t look like a lot, but because of the liability issues, there are a lot of <br />requirements for the contract. The Rec Department had a choice to use a standard contract or <br />one that the Law Department would approve. <br /> <br />Ms. Hayes asked for any more comments from the Commission. <br /> <br />Coke Contract <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo stated that there is a Coke contract since 1999 after a generous Coke contribution <br />to the Rec Center, and that any soft drinks sold in North Olmsted Parks must be Coke products. <br />The beverage issue came up with Community Council’s Homecoming vendors, and this must be <br />included with any agreement signed with them in the future. Mr. Gareau said that Coke did not <br />come here to play hardball; Coke wants to be a corporate citizen of North Olmsted. Our <br />responsibility is to go back to Coke for a four-day window (Homecoming), when other products <br />may be used. Mr. Jesse observed that there are certain cities that are Coke cities and certain <br />cities that are Pepsi cities, and neither the twain shall meet; to which Ms. Hayes said that the <br />schools are Pepsi, and Community Council is neither/nor. Mr. Gareau said that the discussions <br />of Coke in 1999 were more than they should have been. Everyone was concerned with money <br />going here and there, and no one was concerned with what kind of pop could be served in the <br />park at Homecoming. <br /> <br />Dogs in Parks <br /> <br />Also, there are no dogs allowed in the parks, and Ms. Hayes noted that many people just brought <br />their dogs into the car show. Mr. Gareau said he’s seen people chased out of the parks while <br />they were sitting in bleachers watching a game. Mr. Baxter said use the parks for parks, not just <br />ballfields, and let people bring in their dogs. <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.