My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/23/1987 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1987
>
1987 Civil Service Commission
>
07/23/1987 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 8:44:18 AM
Creation date
2/12/2019 5:16:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1987
Board Name
Civil Service Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/23/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
y <br />CIVIL SERVICE MINUTES - 7/23/87 <br />Page #2 <br />glasses of any kind and correct the eyes basically back, she said, that <br />anybody in the 20/40 on up is correctable acuity. She said he had an <br />eye exam on -June 15th and the left eye, which is the one in question, is <br />now at 20/40. <br />Mr. Thompson: Correct. <br />Mr. Wendt: Now, since the surgery is only been done, and is still <br />healing, I understand, she claims that by two weeks from now, or next <br />Tuesday, it will be correctable and that eye is now moving up and will <br />be in the 20/30 range. <br />Mr. Stroh: What's the right eye? <br />Mr. Wendt: The right eye is 20/25 which is in the range now. <br />She claims that eventually both eyes, as the healing takes place, and I <br />only go by what she was telling me, I did not talk to the doctor, she is <br />apparently some sort of office manager. <br />Mr. Thompson: She is his assistant. <br />Mr. Wendt: She said eventually as the healing takes place it will be <br />almost both eyes working together will be 20/20. <br />Mrs. Bahas: So, we're talking on a time frame here, is that correct? <br />Mr. Wendt: We're talking a time frame. <br />Mrs. Bahas: OK <br />Mr. Wendt: She said she would send us a letter .. <br />Mrs. Bahas: Substantiating that? <br />Mr. Wendt: After the examination. <br />Mrs. Bahas: OK <br />Mr. Wendt: You see this changes the picture totally. The only thing I <br />guess we have to make a decision on is basically if the eye comes up <br />where it suppose to be there are guidelines as far as knocking him off <br />the list, as far as I am concerned, would have to be changed. The <br />question is when he went in for this to be interviewed, or whatever, are <br />they saying then at that particular point in time he did not qualify <br />based on their qualification at that point in time? <br />Mr. Wendt: It is a sticky situation. <br />Mr. Stroh: Does he have to qualify at the time he took the examination, <br />or does he have to qualify at the time the position is open? <br />Mrs. Bahas: I think the question here is - were you aware of the exact <br />measurements for qualification at the time you took the test, or at the <br />time you took the interview." <br />Mr. Thompson: I had no idea what they were. I assume as I progressed <br />along someone would have noticed my glasses were so thick—someone would <br />have noticed.. <br />Mrs. Bahas: The problem being - he had the option of being passed over <br />for this first interview process. OK? What were you on - you were <br />being interviewed for which vacancy - for the first vacancy - or do you <br />know? <br />You don't really know, that's the other question. What I'm saying is <br />had he been aware of the exact statistics of what his eyes had to <br />continued - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.