My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/24/1988 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1988
>
1988 Civil Service Commission
>
03/24/1988 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2019 8:44:38 AM
Creation date
2/12/2019 5:38:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1988
Board Name
Civil Service Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/24/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CIVIL SERVICE MEETING - MARCH 24, 1988 - 4:30 P.M. <br />Motion made by Madeline Brookshire to approve the Civil Service minutes <br />of the February meeting as read. <br />Present at this meeting: Commission members; Madeline Brookshire and <br />Chairman, Robert Wendt, <br />Police Chief Thomas Marsh <br />Mr. Wendt: We had a brief discussion at our last meeting concerning the <br />presentation from West Shore. I don't know what your feeling is toward <br />that - what was your impression of that from your standpoint in terms of <br />do you think this is feasible for you to do - would you prefer to do it <br />this way? Chief Marsh: Thd agility test? Wendt: Yes. Chief: Well <br />since the commission handled it in the past I must say I'm not well <br />versed on it. But, I was impressed with the presentation they made and <br />the background and study they have done to develop what they assume to <br />be a good, viable test for police candidates. I would think that if the <br />costs were in the area that the commission had paid in the past that it <br />would certainly be worth considering, because now you're placing it <br />completely in their hands and there is certainly no prejudice on the <br />part of the commission or the police department as a seperate entity is <br />taking care of it and will give you the results. If the cost is way out <br />of line I can't say that we've had any problem with the one that we used <br />in the past. Wendt: Our main consideration here and I know that <br />Madeline has not been involved in it. Tom was briefly, and I've gone <br />through it a couple of times already, the commission did handle it <br />themselves basically and I think the question I asked you last time was <br />there any problem with the physical part of it, I mean the men that you <br />received were they capable of doing what you wanted them to do? Well., <br />you're answer at the time was "yes". Marsh: Right. Wendt: And then in <br />reviewing we still do not have a fixed cost of West Shore information <br />other than what they indicated to us. It would be a lot more costly to <br />do that kind of thing per man than when we do it with 25 people there <br />because they still have to rent the facility, which we would too, we <br />would still use the high school facility, and then in addition, we pay <br />our people who do monitoring a very small stipend; whereas in their case <br />there is a lot more dollars involved. So, at this point in time with <br />the money crunch and everybody looking at everything in terms of dollars <br />we may explore it. I'd like to see it in operation and then see what <br />the actual cost is going to be, and if we see that it's a standardized <br />thing well then, hey I have no problem with myself -personally and -the <br />commission would have to rule, but I'd like to see it myself. Now is <br />that's alright with you in this point in time. Chief Marsh agreed. <br />Wendt: The men that we saw do have to have a doctors thing, we will <br />explore however, and that's one thing we need to do, that on the eye <br />thing , we will try to do that this time to make sure the person can see <br />the dang eye chart before we send them to you and we find out they got <br />20/70 or 20/100 vision which is unacceptable to any one of our <br />criterian, of.course. So, I think that is going to be the way I see <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.