Laserfiche WebLink
;t, <br />N <br />real quick if you don't mind, No this removal that you are reading is for their removal from employment. <br />Mrs. Popa stated I can't understand how this could have happened, is there anything in your rules that <br />shows how someone would be taken off the Civil Service list without being notified, I'm not clear on this <br />that is why I'm here to get some clarity. Mr. Cummings stated my understanding of this is that there is no <br />way they can be taken off the list, we cover so many people, this is what we cover. Mr. Thomay read <br />allowed section 3 page 32 of the Rules and regulations manual. Mr. Cummings stated everyone that is not <br />under the Unclassified list should be on the list. Ms. Cornish stated if you are going to make that change, <br />and I agree with you about putting her on the list, but if you are going to put her name back on the list <br />shouldn't everyone's name be put back on, that was Classified. Mr. Cummings stated everyone that is <br />Classified is covered by us but in different degrees if you can follow me, if the person comes in that is not <br />involved in labor or union that means that they are not covered under union contract then they are covered <br />strictly by Civil Service rules and regulations, if they are covered under a union contract were it is a police, <br />secretaries, and different labors if they are covered under a contract the only part we come in on is if it <br />comes in under initial testing, and testing in general once we have the initial testing the grievance procedure <br />for removal or if something is going wrong is through the union grievance procedure, that is something they <br />have set in place, but I feel they should still be listed as part of Civil Service, and you must know that we <br />can't do anything but the testing, you never know somewhere down the line and I don't think this would ever <br />happen but they could vote to not be part of a union not just one person but the whole outfit, then they <br />would be under Civil Service you follow me, that is why I say that is the only part we have with them that is <br />part of the union organization is initial hire if there is a testing process, if they are not in a union then <br />naturally then they have Civil Service protection, but they all should be listed somewhere. Mr. Thomay <br />asked how people were taken off the Civil Service list in the past who made that decision. Ms. Cornish <br />stated that she didn't know as it happened before she worked as clerk of commissions and before the present <br />board members were members, I know they were being removed because they were union and I got told a <br />couple of times about Judy Ptacek who is on the Classified list under secretary she is union and I was told <br />by Mary -Kay in the finance department that I have to remove her from the list because she is union, I asked <br />the law department can I remove this person and they said no she is classified and told Mary Kay no I have <br />to leave her on the list. Mrs. Popa stated then the next question is if someone is on Civil Service as a <br />secretary there is a different situation at the police station and fire which I don't quite understand the way <br />they work but, if they are in the building department and they are Civil Service is there a reason why they <br />would want to be in the union also. Mr. Cummings stated my goodness yes because we do not have <br />anything to do with wages or working condition or hours of the working conditions, there protection is a lot <br />better because they have procedures to go through for arbitration they can get outside attorneys that are <br />there for them, all we can do for them is do the initial hire for them. Mrs. Popa stated if I become a Civil <br />Service member I pass the test and they say I'm now covered under Civil Service how could I ever be <br />removed from this list. Mr. Cummings stated the only way they can be removed from the list if they were <br />appointed to one of the jobs that are exempted positions. Ms. Cornish stated then an evaluation should be <br />done to see who should and shouldn't be on the list. Mr. Cummings stated the commission would like to get <br />to together with the Mrs. Popa and have a complete list of all employees and then look to see who is suppose <br />to be on the list. Mrs. Popa asked if there was something in the union contract that states that they can't be <br />both. Mr. Cummings stated yes ma'am there is, the state dictates that they are a part of Civil Service but <br />we can't represent them, the state has jurist diction over them, the list should really be called an inactive list, <br />because the only thing we have to do with the people on the list is the hire test or promotional. tests. Mrs. <br />Popa asked then even though some individuals don't appear on this list they are still considered Civil <br />Service, rest assured I can tell her that she has not been removed from Civil Service and we need to re -look <br />to see who all should be on the Civil Service list. Ms. Cornish apologized for interrupting, and asked Mr. <br />Cummings should I put Lisa on the list now or do you want to make a decision tonight that it should be <br />looked into so everyone's names that should be on gets put on. Mr. Cummings stated if Mrs. Popa wouldn't <br />mind coming back to another meeting and bring a list of all employees secretaries, and what not then we can <br />decide which one belongs and which one doesn't, then we would have an accurate list, we could all work <br />together on this if you don't mind. Ms. Cornish stated that the commissions office would help Mrs. Popa to <br />come up with the list, I also think that when someone is hired off the Civil Service list their complete <br />application packet should be forwarded to personal, that way they would have all the individuals original <br />