Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />the candidates at the door, Personnel Selection Services would like to take over from that <br />point. Their monitors are professional people from the general area, but not the immediate area <br />and they are usually people at least a rank above the candidates being tested. Before Personnel <br />Selection Services can administer an agility test, they would need to do a validation study that <br />would be applicable to the department. The price of the validation study would be $3,000 to <br />$5,000 depending on how many people would be in the department They would be able to use <br />that information for about 4-5 exams or 8-10 years. The cost to administer the test would run <br />$700.00 for the first 6 candidates. Mr. Cummings questioned the secretary about the cost <br />factor of St. John's WestShore Hospital doing the agility test and approximately how much we <br />have been spending on the testing. The secretary indicated to Mr. Cummings the cost is $75.00 <br />per candidates and we normally test 20 candidates the total cost of the agility test for the 20 <br />candidates would be $1,500.00. Mr. Michalko indicated there isn't a lot to test police on, as far <br />as agility goes. , The 5 areas they would test are flexibility, coordination, strength, agility and <br />balance, building events around that. They have had few protests. Mr. Michalko indicated that <br />if candidates were satisfied with what was on the written test as far as being job related, they <br />would do far less protesting. Chief Osterhouse indicated he would like to know more about the <br />oral assessment of the fire department testing since he didn't know about the police department. <br />What was the length of time for the oral assessment? Mr. Michalko indicated they tailor make <br />all oral assessments and use a combination of background, previous experience, supervisor <br />experience, tactics experience and they like to use internal documents rather than just text <br />books. The length of the oral assessment would vary depending on what the department <br />wanted. Mr. Cummings suggested that an advantage to using Personnel Selections Services, <br />Inc., was the fact they furnished all the monitors and the security would be better as their would <br />be less handling on the part of the Civil Service Commission. <br />E. Cummings motioned to accept Personnel Selections Services, Inc. To administer the written <br />portion of the Police Entry Level test. Seconded by J. Thomay and unanimously approved. <br />The discussion was then opened to decide what percentage to use for the written test. It has <br />been a standard practice to use 70% which seemed to work out so far. Mr. Michalko indicated <br />that their test scores curve out at 70%, some places use 80% but he felt 70% was more accurate. <br />Mr. Michalko indicated that a lot of jurisdictions don't use the phrase pass or fail they put <br />everyone on the list, whether they pass or fail and telling someone they failed could leave yourself <br />open for protests. The secretary indicated that we do not use the word fail we normally tell them <br />they are not on our eligibility list. Mr. Michalko indicated if your list last for two years then <br />70% should be a good number if you have 700 - 800 people talking the test you need to make <br />the percentage higher so you don't have such a long list on file. <br />E. Cummings motioned to make the cutoff at 70%. Seconded by J. Thomay, unanimously <br />approved. <br />B) The commissioners will need to review the ad that will be placed in the Plain Dealer, as well as <br />the application packets for the entry level Police Officers test. <br />E. Cummings motioned to accept the Plain Dealer ad as written as well as the application <br />packets. Seconded by J. Thomay and unanimously approved. <br />N <br />