Index - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION INDEX FOR 2005 MEETINGS R. Giesser made a motion to acknowledge receipt of requests from Brandon Cole, Kenneth Kulczycki, and Russell Hageman to have their names removed from the fire fighter eligibility list. The Commission accepts the requests. The motion was seconded by M. Ubaldi and unanimously approved. JUNE 20, 2005 W. Hohmann made amotion to appoint D. Eccleston to be the Civil Service Secretary. The motion was seconded by M. Ubaldi and unanimously approved. R. Giesser made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. The motion was seconded by M. Ubaldi and unanimously approved. R. Giesser made a motion to appoint W. Hohmann to be a member of the Northeast Ohio Association of Civil Service Commissioners and submit the appropriate paperwork if this process has not been completed for this year. The motion was seconded by M. Ubaldi and unanimously approved. R. Giesser made a motion to accept removal of Brian Clute and Alexander Casey. W. Hohmann seconded the motion and unanimously approved. If there are indications from the Fire Department that there will be additional hiring made for entry level fireman, R. Giesser made a motion to certify Mathias Burke, Daniel Holstein, Mike Fusco, Bryan Gallagher and Mike Rodrigues as the top five names. W. Hohmann seconded the motion and unanimously approved. M. Ubaldi made a motion to classify the Employment Specialist and un -classify the Secretary I/Civil Service Secretary. R. Giesser seconded the motion and unanimously approved. Mr. Ubaldi made a motion in the North Olmsted Civil Service Rules and Regulations Handbook, Rule III Section 8 has Sub Sections a — e. All Sub Sections, except 8d, will be accepted as written, as voted on by the Civil Service Commission in previous meetings. Section 8d will read as follows: "For Police Department Promotional Examinations, efficiency evaluations credits shall be awarded based on the efficiency evaluation of the applicant within six months of the scheduled examination, using the following scale: Efficiency Rating (E) Exceeds Expectations 1 Point Efficiency Rating (M) Meets Expectations 0 Points Efficiency Rating (B) Below Expectations 0 Points Efficiency Rating (U) Unsatisfactory 0 Points" R. Giesser seconded the motion and unanimously approved.