Laserfiche WebLink
three (3) times. The only concern with that change is that the Commission will be passing up very <br />good candidates versus physically passing over candidates. The previous Safety Director, Tom <br />Terbrack, and Police Chief Wozniak had reservations about the change. The Commission <br />eventually chose to adopt the language because the Commission did not think it was untoward to <br />have competition continue in the interview process. Those candidates are still in competition for <br />whatever criteria that the appointing authority may apply. The Commission has looked at problems <br />with five (5) certifications for a candidate; candidates were passed over again and again and not for <br />reasons that would allow them to be removed voluntarily or involuntarily. Another concern for <br />implementing the change would be potential unfairness to candidates still on the list who cannot be <br />certified to a vacancy because of candidates who have been passed over and over. A lot of what the <br />Commission does is balance interests, ranking and certifying candidates. At this point, the <br />Commission will stay with this language; however, even though the Commission was unanimous in <br />retaining this language, they want to see if this would better address the problems in the past. If this <br />does not seem to fit the needs, the Commission can revert back to what they had previously. <br />Mr. Boatman is not clear on the meaning of Rule XI, Layoffs, Section 5, Displacement Procedure b, <br />3. An inquiry was made if this was intended to prevent an unqualified candidate from assuming a <br />position. Some of this is related to bumping and recall and if there is a recall you can theoretically <br />have someone who is trying to bump back but is not holding the positions necessary for the person <br />they are trying to come back into. The Fire Department has one Fire Chief, one Assistant Fire <br />Chief, 4 Captains, 6 Lieutenants and the Firefighters below. Hypothetically, if the City decides to <br />lay-off a Lieutenant and that Lieutenant has been in the position for five (5) years, the lowest <br />Lieutenant would get laid off. An inquiry was made if he would lose his right to bump back down <br />to a Firefighter. The Law Department believes what this section is trying to ensure is that if he <br />bumps back down then he still carries the requirements of the position. The Fire Department is <br />required to maintain the same certifications. The concern is the last sentence "...and held the <br />classification not more than three (3) years prior." Some of the changes were changes in State Law <br />that the Commission was considering to adopt into their local rules. The concern is that thisrrule <br />may hurt the possibilities of promotions because candidates are looking for job security. The statute <br />is part of the State Code and when this was adopted the Commission follows the State Law to some <br />extent; on the other hand, the Commission can follow Home Rule. A suggestion was made striking <br />the end of that last sentence. A discussion followed concerning the lay off of Fairview's Assistant <br />Fire Chief; he lost his right to bump back down because he did not maintain his paramedic <br />certification which was required to maintain by the city. An inquiry was made if this means in the <br />bumping process if a person under you has held that position longer than three (3) years than that <br />person cannot be bumped. The Law Department interprets this as being if you are promoted out of <br />that classification and you have been gone more than three (3) years and should a lay off occur and <br />affects you, first you look within your classification for someone with less seniority. If you have <br />been gone from that classification for more than three (3) years you cannot bump. A suggestion <br />was made to have Mr. Boatman submit correspondence in writing to the Commission for a more <br />thorough review. <br />V. NEW BUSINESS: <br />The Commission has been informed that there will be a Road Foreman vacancy in the Service <br />Department August 1, 2008. A call was made to Pat Ramsey of Ramsey & Associates; Mrs. <br />Ramsey has tested for this position about eight (8) or so times; there would be 100 questions on the <br />examination including questions on supervisor, management, and leadership, snow and ice removal, <br />roads, storm sewers, pot holes etc.; the cost would be $680 for the first 40 applicants and $9 each <br />thereafter; the salary range would be $36,400 - $62,400. The Road Foreman reports directly to the <br />