5/6/2019 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Proposal consists of a fence on a corner lot. Property is zoned C -One Family Residence. The following variances are requested: 1. An 18 in. variance for height of a fence constructed on a corner lot in the side yard; code allows fences up to 30 in. high, applicant shows 48 in., Section 1135.02(D)(3). 2. A variance for a solid fence constructed on a corner lot in the side yard; code requires fences to be 50% open; applicant shows a solid fence, Section 1135.02(D)(3). Note: A 6 in. fence setback from side street right-of-way is shown. Mr. Aspery said the applicant is proposing to install a four -foot board -on -board fence in the side yard of their home on a corner lot. Code states that a fence that is at least 50% open and that does not exceed 30 inches in height may be constructed on a corner lot in the side and rear yards at the street line. The applicant shows a solid, or 0% open, fence 48 inches in height. A six-inch setback is proposed for this fence where a 20 foot setback would otherwise be required by code for a fence of this height and opacity. Mr. Thomas wants to install a four -foot fence to protect his children. The fence would be installed along the sidewalk area, not the ditch. Mr. Papotto asked about the existing shrubs, Mr. Thomas says the shrubs are his and will be removed and replaced with the fence. He added that the fence will be a solid wood fence. Mr. R.aig estimated that there is about five feet between the house and sidewalk. Mr. Papotto was concerned about the sight line for the neighbor to the east to see pedestrians in the area. Mr. Mackey was concerned about having a fence inches away from the sidewalk and the effects that would have on the neighbors' visibility. Mr. Mackey would be more supportive of a fence that would be contiguous with the home. Mr. Thomas wants a solid fence to protect kids walking by who reach in to pet a dog. Mr. Raig is not supportive due to the location to the sidewalk and the visibility issues and pointed out that landscaping would not require a variance. Mr. Thomas asked to table his proposal and make adjustments. Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Mackey, to table the proposal for 19-13600; Joseph Thomas; 3183 Walter Road until the next meeting, motion passed 3-0. 19-13603; Ronald McNulty; 6029 Timber Trail Drive Representatives: Ronald & Jacqueline McNulty, owners Proposal consists of a building addition in the rear yard. Property is zoned B -One Family Residence. The following variance is requested: 1. A 13 ft. variance for rear building setback; code requires dwellings to be set back at least 50 ft. from the rear property line, application shows 37 ft.; Section 1135.06(D). Mr. Aspery said the applicant is requesting a variance of 13 feet to allow for the addition of a 288 square foot sunroom to the rear of their existing home. The setback from the rear of the house is currently 50 feet and the proposed addition would reduce this to 37 feet. Code requires a rear building setback of no less than 50 feet. Mr. McNulty said they have lived in the home since 1993 and trees would prevent the addition from negatively impacting the rear neighbor. They would like to add the improvement to the home to allow them to live in their home longer. Ms. McNulty said the addition would extend the indoor and outdoor living space with the addition. Mr. Mackey was in favor of the proposal, Mr. Raig and Mr. Papotto agreed.