7/1/2019 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

before tapering back to the required driveway width, applicant shows depth of 30 ft.; Section 1135.02(B)(2)(c). Motion passed 4-0. 19-14218, Robert Follen; 6876 Warrington Drive Representatives: Robert Follen, owner; Drew Meyer, 6867 Warrington Drive Proposal consists of a fence on a corner lot. Property is zoned A -One Family Residence. The following variances are requested: 1. A 42 in. variance for height of a fence constructed on a corner lot in the side yard; code allows fences up to 30 in. high, applicant shows 72 in., Section 1135.02(D)(3). 2. A variance for a solid fence constructed on a corner lot in the side yard; code requires fences to be 50% open; applicant shows a solid fence, Section 1135.02(D)(3). Note: A 10 ft. fence setback from side street right-of-way is shown. Mr. Aspery stated that the applicant is proposing to install a 6 -foot vinyl privacy fence in the side and rear yard of their home situated on a corner lot. Code states that a fence that is at least 50% open and that does not exceed 30 inches in height may be constructed on a corner lot in the side and rear yards at the street line. The applicant shows a solid fence 72 inches in height. A ten foot setback is proposed while 20 feet would otherwise be required by code. Mr. Follen wants to match the fence of the property behind him which is 10 feet from the right-of-way. He wants to enclose his yard because he has a dog. Approximately six years ago, a piece of concrete went through his window so he also wants the fence for privacy. Mr. Aspery said the Planning Department takes the position that the code requirement was reduced from 50 feet to 20 feet and the Board should keep that in mind. Mr. Papotto clarified that the proposed fence would be allowed if it was 20 feet from the right-of-way, Mr. Aspery said yes. Mr. Raig pointed out that the fence is proposed to go to the front of the home, not set back from the front like their neighbor's. Mr. Raig asked if there was an easement in the rear of the property, Mr. Aspery did not know. Mr. Papotto believed if the fence was shorter, it would be more palatable and he did not see the hardship of the applicant since he could move it back 10 feet. Mr. Mackey preferred to see the required setback observed. Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Raig, to approve the following variances for 19- 14218; Robert Follen; 6876 Warrington Drive: 1. A 42 in. variance for height of a fence constructed on a corner lot in the side yard; code allows fences up to 30 in. high, applicant shows 72 in., Section 1135.02(D)(3). 2. A variance for a solid fence constructed on a corner lot in the side yard; code requires fences to be 50% open; applicant shows a solid fence, Section 1135.02(D)(3). Motion denied 0-4. 19-14224; Sean McKay; 25112 Gessner Road Representative: Sean McKay, owner Proposal consists of a new driveway. Property is zoned B -One Family Residence. The following variance is requested: 1. A variance for width of a driveway serving a detached garage; code allows a maximum width of 12 f in the front yard and 24 ft. in the side and rear yard, applicant shows a width of 20 ft. in the front yard and 26 ft. 6 in. in the rear yard; Section 1135.02(B)(2)(c).