9/14/2020 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A 2 ft. 6 in. variance for rear yard setback of a patio; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 47 ft. 6 in., Section 1135.05(D). The applicant proposes to construct a patio roof that will be 47 feet 6 inches at the closest point to the rear property line. This structure is held to the required setback of the dwelling which is 50 feet; therefore, a 2 foot 6 -inch variance is requested. Mr. Foutz said they would like to install roof over their stamped patio that will extend from the back of house to the fireplace. Ms. Lieber had no objection. The variance is minimal and the lot is irregularly shaped. It will have no negative impact on neighboring properties. An email of support from Chris and Traudel Moore received on September 11, 2020 was read into the record. Mr. Allain thought it was logical and would add to the property and neighborhood. Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Mackey, to approve the following variance for 20- 17445; Richard Foutz; 3971 Tennyson Lane: 1. A 2 ft. 6 in. variance for rear yard setback of a patio; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 47 ft. 6 in., Section 1135.05(D). Motion passed 5-0. 20-17471; Bob & Lisa Everden; 5502 Ouail Run Representatives: Robert & Lisa Everden, owners Proposal consists of a fence on a corner lot. Property is zoned B -One Family Residence. 1. A 16 ft. variance for setback of a fence in the side yard of a corner lot; code requires 20 ft., applicant shows 4 ft., Section 1135.02(D)(3). The applicant is proposing to install fencing in the rear yard of their corner lot. Two different types of fencing are proposed. A five-foot high, wrought iron fence will run parallel to the side street set back four feet from the lot line. A six-foot high solid vinyl privacy fence will replace the current wood fence that runs along the rear property line. The two fences join at an angle. Any portion of new fencing within 20 feet of the side lot line requires a variance for encroaching into the setback. A various was granted in 1992 for a period of three years and has since expired. Ms. Everden said they are remodeling their back yard and they would like to replace the worn out fence. The deck will be replaced after they install a paved patio. The fence would help protect their dogs and the pedestrians that frequently walk by. The wrought iron would look nicer. Mr. Everden said the pine trees would be removed when the fence is installed which would also increase visibility. Ms. Lieber had no objection. The lot and its neighbor share a rear lot line. The neighbor's drive to the west is about 70 feet away. There is existing solid fence along the rear property line. The new wrought iron fencing is not likely to create any further safety hazard; also the location on the oval makes this a very low traffic area. The opacity standards will be met for the fencing along the side street. Mr. Papotto asked if landscaping would be installed next to the fence, Mr. Everden said a low grass may be installed. Ms. Patton asked if the utility easement would be affected. The Everdens said the fence would be installed about four feet from the utility box and the current angle of the fencing would remain. Mr. Gareau did not think the wording of the motion needed to subsume previous variances. Mr. Mackey was not concerned about the four - foot setback since the fence would be wrought iron fence and he thought it would be a nice