9/14/2020 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The proposal is to install a five-foot high vinyl picket fence in the rear yard of this corner lot. The portion of fence running parallel to the side street (Mary Kay) is set back three feet from the sidewalk, so a 17 -foot variance is requested. Ms. Cormier said they moved in recently and Marquette is pretty busy. They have two kids under three years old and would like to maximize the back yard space for them to play in. The taller fence is needed because they have Great Danes. They chose a fence style that would be aesthetically pleasing and would be 50% open. Ms. Lieber pointed out that the applicant's rear lot line is the neighbor's side lot line. The proposed fence will run along the neighbor's side lot line nearly to the sidewalk. The neighbor's driveway is less than 40 feet from the property line. These neighbors have objected with concerns that the fence will impact visibility and safety and will be a detriment to the neighborhood character. Mr. Gareau pointed out that there is an easement for the overhead power lines. An email of opposition from Sally Ranieri received on September 13, 2020 and an email of opposition from James and Denise Hoover received on September 10, 2020 were read into the record. Ms. Hoover was unhappy that the new neighbors did not discuss the fence before applying for permits. No one else on the street has a fence in their front yard and they did not support having a fence installed. Mr. Hoover asked how far off the property line the fence would be installed. Ms. Lieber said the fence could be installed on the property line and fence spacing is only required if there is an existing fence on the other property. The Hoovers asked why two gates are proposed. Mr. Cormier said the hedges are to remain since they are eight to ten feet tall and are dense. He wanted to have two gates to allow for plenty of room to get equipment in and out. Ms. Patton was concerned about the fence abutting the neighbor's front yard and the effect it would have on the neighborhood. The fence type would allow more visibility but was still concerned for the visibility for people on the cul-de-sac. Mr. Allain thought the lot is unique because of the position of the homes and he appreciated that the fence is 50% open. Mr. Papotto appreciated the openness of the fence but he thought three feet from the sidewalk was too close. Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Ms. Patton, to approve the following variance for 20- 17473; Connie Cormier; 27601 Marquette Boulevard: 1. A 17 ft. variance for the setback of a fence in the side and rear yard of a corner lot; code requires 20 ft., applicant provides 3 ft., Section 1135.02(D)(3). Motion denied 0-5. COMMERCIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS 20-17329; Pro -Automotive; 23525 Lorain Road Representatives: Rami Karsheh, owner; Kevin Robinette, 2091 South Belvoir Boulevard, South Euclid, OH; Angela Williamson, Councilwoman Proposal consists of updates to the site plan. Property is zoned B-1 Local Business. 1. A use variance for vehicle storage accessory to a vehicle towing facility located on a separate parcel of land; code does not permit, Section 1139.03.