Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Nader read the current definition of apartment which "means a multi-famifv building <br />comprised of three 131 or more dwelling units. separated from each otlher by fireproof walls. <br />floors and, or ceihinis, of concrete. masonry or the equi%afent nuan-ed one abuse the other <br />anchor side by side each unit haw ine at least one (I) entrance connected to a common interior <br />hall leading to Ilse exterior . She asked specilicalk what changes will need to he made. <br />Mr. Grealis stated the wording—common interior hall" IIe believes that the "common interior <br />half' is restricting current rental market trends from being developed in the vitt. <br />Mr. Anderson asked chat differentiates apartments from condominiums townhomes and cluster <br />homes' Is it property ownership' Mr. Grealis answered that the ooh del lerence bch%ecn an <br />apartment and e%er%thing else mentioned is ov%nership. A discussion tads had r ,,ardin�, rentals <br />and variance requests. Director l pion stated that an estensoe rev iet% wNas done liar all the <br />residential zoning districts except for the senior residents since that is something different hhe <br />residential cluster is single famih attached dwellings tt ith not more than three dwelling units in <br />one hill lding and the%are it liar sane single family cluster home. <br />Director Ipton noted the rental housing zoning dd iitition or multiple residence apartment <br />district does not fit t%iill one another. Mr. Matthews asked if there arc an% areas than building is <br />already acceptable depending on the zoning? And in the apartment district, you are lookin , to <br />add accessibility spccificalk7 Director lepton answered no. In some areas it is allotrable in <br />single Family residential cluster hill not ounce than three units in one building. Mr. Matthews <br />asked if a similar product could he achieved with rental units w ithout modib ine the code! Mr. <br />llpton explained no because of them not being able to share a firewall. <br />Ms. Hentann staled that the Cit% of North Olmsted docs not have this type of housing that <br />Director Cpton is tr%inn to brim to the city. Ms. I Iemann described the t icttpoint deyclopment <br />across the street from Springvale and hotv it relates to the sinJe and multi-tame x residence. <br />All. Nader stated that the o%crall ohiective is to pro%ide some opportunity in the ChN of North <br />Olmstead to build more di%crsc li%ing arrangements throughout the Cit \. Ms. I Iemann <br />commented that in North Olmsted the housim, stock sullcrs because we do not ha%e the modern <br />trend of housing to attract yotmeer indix duals. She explained that we need to make sure that t%e <br />have pro%isions to be able to attract a ne%% tape of resident to North Olmstead Mr, Anderson <br />commented that opening up the language would he a -real ad%antege to new dev ehopment. Mr. <br />OhNos commented that instead of having a shared internal halh%a% people can hate a structure <br />with their own exterior entrances and by changing the code it gives opportunities for de%elopers <br />and tenants. <br />Director I:pion asked it the nest step would he the boards recommendation to council'. Mr. <br />O Mallc} ans%acd yes and he agree, also this request should not he considered in isolation. Ile <br />behie%es it has to be re%ic'ed in connection %%ith the other restrictions within the code the <br />multiple residence district under the permitted uses allows for some of the options, but <br />townhouses is not one of options. I le noted that if mulliphe residence district is conti-sous to <br />a cluster district. then the owner of multiple residrnce. a piece of land could potentialh dcvclop <br />it as clusters. %It O'Mallc% commented that he docs agree t%ith the general concept that the <br />center hall apartment as it appears in the code to he outdated and the definition ol'apartment as it <br />is presented, would allow lir more options. <br />