2/28/2024 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

expected. but Mr. Filarski expressed confidence in satisfactory results. Mr. O'Malley emphasized a deferential review for independent political subdivisions, highlighting the cooperation between the school district and the city. He commended the well- prepared presentation and expressed enthusiasm for the project. He suggested focusing on internal traffic details and parking requirements during the phase I review, emphasizing that the project aligns with the city"s goals without conflicts. Mr. David opened the floor for public comments. Neil Schultz on Birch Circle. Kathy Urmetz on Coe Avenue, Connie Lupica on Coe Avenue Mr. Schultz a 40 -year resident, expressed concern about traffic issues around the school. especially during drop-off and pick-up times. He raised questions about potential fencing, access for walkers, and the impact on nearby streets. Mr. Schultz emphasized the need for careful consideration regarding traffic management and the fencing of the school property. Ms. Urmetz raised concern about access to the walkway around the school, with the response that a fence would protect surrounding properties, limiting direct access. Additionallv, during the construction phases. the resident expressed worries about dirt and requested consideration for a barrier to mitigate dust and maintain a comfortable environment. The reply assured compliance with erosion control and dust control plans, adhering to state and city codes. Ms. Lupica expressed concerns about the lack of trees in the back of the school, requesting to see the design for that area. She mentioned a pine ball deer that visits and emphasized the importance of maintaining trees. The response acknowledged limitations due to the storm water management basin but committed to exploring available space for additional plantings. The request to view the back of the school was deferred to the next phase of the project. Mr. Olivos raised concerns about safety measures around the school. particularly the crosswalk on Walter Road. He emphasized the need for city enhancements beyond school boundaries, such as flashing lights and speed reductions during school hours. Mr. Filarski responded. mentioning ongoing discussions and plans, including the Safe Routes to School program with ODOT, which reviews school areas for pedestrian safety improvements. Measures discussed include pedestrian leading crosswalks, and countdown pedestrian indicators, with updates to be provided in future meetings. Mr. Leon suggested using the school safety officer for input regarding pedestrian safety for the students. He also raised concerns about potential traffic issues during drop-off and pick-up times, especially with the number of buses. He suggested allowing buses to wrap about the back of the school to prevent traffic backups. The response highlighted the intent to provide flexibility, allowing buses to line up along the sidewalk from the back to the front. This arrangement would apply to both drop-offs and pick-ups. ensuring efficient flow. Mr. Leon also emphasized the importance of considering accessibility for students in wheelchairs, with the assurance that the new school will adhere to all accessibility codes. Mr. David expressed concerns about the amount of parking and the overall sit plan. Questions were raised about the parking count, and it was clarified that both code requirements and collaboration with the school district influenced the design. The additional parking beyond code was explained as a provision for events. The facility's capacity was discussed, accommodating approximately 1.784 students. aligning with a state -mandated enrollment study. Questions regarding traffic management durincy pick-up and drop-off times, traffic flow onto Lorain, and potential modifications to the traffic