My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/27/2025 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2025
>
Civil Service Commission
>
01/27/2025 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 12:15:06 PM
Creation date
3/13/2025 12:14:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2025
Board Name
Civil Service Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/27/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Anybody who did on our staff would be fired. We work with over 250 agencies. No one is locked in <br />to any contract. <br />They do it because of the work we've done, the trust we've established, and the training that every <br />single assessor has done. No one at PRADCO does anything independently until they have shown <br />competence over and over again. So, I just want to speak to the strictness of the process, the care <br />involved in doing it right, as well as the empathy for the candidates. <br />So, the process is one that will always be judged and should be judged, but we would stand behind <br />our results. That is all. <br />Lieutenant Barrett: <br />Thank you. I think I've made my point clear of what my concerns are in the one section. It just <br />doesn't seem plausible to have a 16 -point difference. <br />As Captain Walling has said, if the questions were the same, the scores would be the same. She just <br />said it in her closing argument. Dr. Borodkin also admits that it's subjective based on the person that <br />we're interviewing with. And it is possible to have two different people having two different <br />outcomes. But with the same questions, there should not be a 16 -point difference. And that is my <br />concern in just one section of this test. <br />You heard what I had to say. You had the little PowerPoint I put. You know my concerns. <br />And I asked the Commission to review what I've said. And I know you'll take it seriously and come <br />up with an answer. And I thank. everyone in the room for your time and patience. <br />Thank you. <br />Commissioner Flannery: <br />Thank you. And just be aware, we do tale it really serious and we will have lots I'm sure to discuss <br />Commissioner Cotofan: <br />Just I guess a further clarification question for you. So the questions that exist to Mr. Barrett's point <br />are you could ask many questions but there's sub -questions within those questions, right? So you <br />say you have 10 questions in your test but then there's all these different factors and components. <br />So the question could lead into say another 10 questions related to this behavior, this 2 out of 5. So <br />there's a very strong possibility that yes, you may have answered the question. The initial set of <br />questions are the exact same but all your sub -questions have a difference in score from 2 years ago <br />to now. <br />Dr. Borodkin: <br />The key differences are and I would separate it into 2 things. <br />The questions can be the same but the answers weren't. So if the answers are not the same, I would <br />not expect the same result even if I could ask you how tall you are. You're 5'10". <br />Next time you say you're 62". The question is the same but the answer is different and what we go <br />by is the answer. <br />Commissioner Flannery: <br />Mr. O'Malley, do you have anything further? <br />Asst. Law Director O'Malley: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.