Laserfiche WebLink
The board inquired about easement concerns, and it was clarified that a five-foot utility easement <br />may exist, but the proposed structure would maintain six feet of clearance. The applicant <br />confirmed that the third garage bay would be used to store classic cars and motorcycles currently <br />stored offsite. He also stated that the existing shed would be removed and that he had no <br />intention of adding another structure in the future. <br />A motion was made by Mr. Mackey and seconded by Mr. Ammons to approve the variance <br />request. After brief discussion, board members expressed support, noting the improvement to the <br />property and challenges posed by the lot size. <br />The motion passed unanimously, 5-0. <br />260-2025; Thomas Drickhammer; 6479 Mckenzie Rd. <br />Representatives: Thomas and Mela Drickhammer <br />A variance request was reviewed for the installation of a new 8'x10' storage shed at 6479 <br />McKenzie Road. The request sought permission to place the shed within the required front <br />building setback on the side street of a corner lot, which is not permitted by code. The applicant <br />stated that the old shed had been removed, and the new one would be placed on an existing <br />concrete pad adjacent to the garage for ease of access, especially in winter. The shed would <br />match the garage in appearance and be minimally visible from neighboring properties. <br />The board confirmed that the shed would align with the back of the garage, with possible slight <br />adjustment to allow for landscaping. There were no objections from the public or the building <br />department. The board members expressed support for the practicality of the request and noted <br />that the proposed placement would not negatively impact the character of the neighborhood. <br />A motion was made by Mr. Mackey and seconded by Ms. Galateanu to approve the variance <br />request. <br />The motion to approve the variance passed unanimously, 5-0. <br />261-2025; Eirini Ntiniakou; 23112 Virginia Ave. <br />Representative: Atty. Jim Petropouleas Residents: Jeff Graff, Lisa Colegrass <br />A case was reviewed regarding an appeal for an extension of time to address fire damage at <br />23112 Virginia Avenue. The properly experienced a house fire on March 25, 2025, and the <br />Building Commissioner issued a violation notice on April 30, requiring repairs or demolition <br />within 30 days. The applicant, through legal counsel, requested a six-month extension, citing the <br />presence of a tenant who had not yet vacated, which prevented lawful access and delayed <br />restoration work. The attorney explained that the property was not insured beyond liability <br />coverage, and all repairs would be out-of-pocket. <br />Opposing comments were made by the neighboring property owner and current tenant, both <br />expressing long-standing frustration with the condition of the property and poor maintenance <br />