Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and requirements of the department or board; (3) a list of criteria by which firms will be <br />evaluated; and (4) notice of any meeting or conference with firms that will be held. The <br />evaluation criteria for any contract awarded under this section shall include, but need not be <br />limited to, the following: (1) the competence of the firm to perform the required personal <br />services as indicated by technical training, education andlor experience of the firm's personnel <br />who would be assigned to perform the wark; (2) the ability of the firm to perform the required <br />personal services competently and expeditiously as indicated by the firm's workload and the <br />availability of necessary personnel, equipment and facilities; and (3) past performance of the <br />firm as reflected by the evaluations of the director or board, other city directars or boards, or <br />other administrative officials, and previous other clients of the firm with respect to such factors <br />as quality of work, success in controlling costs, and success in meeting deadlines. A copy of the <br />RFQ shall, if practicable, be attached to the legislation that seeks authorization to solicit SOQs. <br />(c) Upon obtaining legislative approval, the director or board shall give notice of the <br />RFQ by advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation. Such advertisement shall be <br />published at least one (1) week prior to the deadline by which firms must submit SOQs. The <br />director or board may, in addition, advertise in professional and trade publications or other <br />appropriate publications, and/or may extend direct invitations to known firms that provide the <br />personal services sought. <br />(d) Following completion of the time period for receipt of SOQs, the selection <br />committee established by director or board pursuant to Section 112.04 above shall evaluate all <br />SOQs timely received based upon the evaluation criteria specified in the RFQ. On the basis of <br />these evaluations, the selection committee shall select three (3) or more of the highest qualified <br />firms for further consideration. If the committee has received less than three (3) SOQs for <br />evaluation, or determines that fewer than three (3) firms are qualified to perform the required <br />personal services, then the committee may select less than three (3) firms for further <br />consideration, or the director or board may cancel the selection process. <br />(e) The selection committee shall request technical proposals from each of the firms <br />selected for further consideration. The committee may also request that all firms selected for <br />further consideration make a presentation to elabarate upon their technical proposals, statements <br />of qualifications, and/or any other pertinent information. The committee may permit revisions of <br />proposals so long as all firms who have been selected for further consideration are given an equal <br />opportunity to revise their proposals. <br />(o The selection committee shall rank all remaining firms based upon the quality and <br />feasibility of their proposals, including any authorized revisions thereto. <br />(g) The director or board, or in the discretion of the director or board, the selection <br />committee, shall enter into contract negotiations with the highest ranked firm to determine the <br />terms and conditions of the proposed personal services contract, including the compensation to <br />be paid by the City to the firm. If negotiations fail, negotiations with the highest ranked firm <br />shall be terminated, and the director, board, or committee, as applicable, shall enter into <br />negotiations with second highest ranked firm. This process shall continue until a contract is <br />successfully negotiated. If the director, board or committee is unsuccessful in negotiating a <br />4 <br />q . <br />_ i