|
=:Public Hearing Minutes 2-5-70
<br />-3-
<br />be an even flow; therefore, an increase in apron size was necessary,
<br />etc.,
<br />Mr. Oring further commented that a 25' radius on driveways is not
<br />too excessive an opening along the street; perhaps should be 50'
<br />either side of driveway.
<br />Mr. H. Dean, 24510 Clairshire Drive, said he saw no need of change in
<br />Zoning Ordinance.
<br />Mr. D. Gates, 4437 Silverdate, said he would like to know if Council
<br />had checked this Ordinance out with other communities, comparing it
<br />with their zoning ordinances? Do they have comparable restrictions?
<br />He feels residents might move to surrounding communities where zoning
<br />is not so strict.
<br />Mr. T. Gallagher, 28646 Lorain Road, referred to commercial real estate.
<br />He said North Olmsted has become unsuitable for commercial building be-
<br />cause of zoning regulations. He then cited an example to illustrate his
<br />point.
<br />Mr. D. Abram questioned Section 1213.04, second paragraph.
<br />Ordinance 69-210:
<br />An Ordinance amending sections 1125.25, 1125.62, 1133.10, 1133.13
<br />(Sub-Paragraph A), 1141.08, 1153.05, 1157.01, 1174.08, 1205.07 (Sub-
<br />Paragraph A), 1205.11 (Sub-Paragraph E), 1212.02, (Sub-Paragraph C),
<br />1215.01: And enacting Sections 1133.17, 1205.09 (Sub-Paragraph F),
<br />1206.01, 1206.02, 1206.03, 1206.04, 1206.05, 1206.06, 1206.07, 1206.08,
<br />1206.09, 1206.10, 1206.11, 1206.12, 1206.13, 1206.14, 1206.15, 1206.16,
<br />1206.17, and 1231.02, (Sub-Paragraph B), of Ordinance No. 62-33, ENACTED
<br />June 19, 1962, entitled "An Ordinance dividing the City of North Olmsted,
<br />Ohio, into Districts for the purpose of regulating and restricting the
<br />location of buildings and other structures, and of premises to be used
<br />for trade, industry, residence or other specified uses: regulating and
<br />limiting the height of buildings and other structures, regulating the
<br />bulk and location of buildings and other structures, the percentage of
<br />lot occupancy, set-back building lines and area of yards, courts and
<br />open spaces: providing for a method of Administration: for an adminis-
<br />trative Board: and for the imposition of penalties for violation and
<br />repealing previous ordinances inconsistent therewith."
<br />No one spoke in favor of Ordinance.
<br />Against No. 69-210:
<br />Mr. J. Simmons, 29603 Lorain Road, referred to Page 8, Section 1205.11,
<br />asking "What is a standpipe?"
<br />
|