Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />- GOtuTC.?1-1?'ri'?tte3 _Of__1.2'"3?]? -5` _ <br />of the cost because the Comaittei; ae Cdnucil, are.not villing to tAvl--? ?the taxpaqers pay the money. He refexrad.to--• 3,.???r ???_3'?aiC? <br />in respanee to an inquirq by Mr. Grady which atates, ammg oCher thisigs, <br />that if we requeat underground wires the Public Utilities wili asrk us to <br />pay for them. Further, we do nat anlq have the ward of C.E.I. on this <br />buti also the confizmation cf the State Regul.atcry Board that this is a <br />fact. The Coumittee, therefore, is aot `rilling ta recomend to Couscil <br />that the taxpayers of the City of North Olmsted pay a miliion and a half <br />dollaxs. Regardiag the relocatian of the subatation - t2ey (C.E.I.) have <br />relocated it, but juat a ssall distance so that it does not meet with Mr. <br />Childs' indication of s relocatioa. Mr. West commnted that the Conmittee <br />aad most of Coimeii weat cut snd looked at the various areas and came to <br />the conclusion that if same hu to case in this was the baat route. He <br />mentiaaad that C.E.I. still owes him an answer to h#s queatiom °/why can't <br />they bring in the extra pcrwer by the preaent rontea that they twtve xfght <br />naw enlarging the existixtg su?staticma?" C.E.I. ia mak#ng a detsiled <br />studq of this - indication ie they prabably cannot do it, but hav+e agreed <br />to thoxoughlq stnctq it. Mr. West stated thfs queetfoa has to be braught <br />up at the Plartning Comission. <br />Mr. Childs, 5998 Columbia Rd., discussed the ditfesence between low voltage <br />and higher voltage; also caro?a which causes t.v. iaterference, etc. <br />Mr. West cited various booklets and informatian received by him from ttte <br />Federal Governmeat; i.e., Dept. of Interior - Agriculture - Federal Poaer <br />Commiseion - report of President's Couasel. He also referred ta reaport <br />of President's Cc>mmissian on Recreatian ac?d Natural Basutq, quotiag ane <br />of the sect3ons regarding high temion wires which states ths vradergramding <br />of high voltage Iines is sti11 a technical problem and, as a result, placing <br />all such lines underground is not yet a feasible alternate. Discuasion <br />continued. <br />Mr. B. Geisser, Careq Lane, aeked why the proposed substation is not on <br />the same piece of legislation. <br />Mr. West explained that the'sul.atation will have to go before the Board <br />of Zoning Appeals. C.B.I. cannot go bafore the Board without having a <br />plan approved for power lines. Discussion of location of eubataticm and <br />pawer lines continued. <br />Mr. S. Hess, 25427 Butternut Ridge Rd., feeia line not only devaluates <br />his property but makes it unsalable. <br />Mr. C. Crabbs, 25575 Butternut Ridge Rd., comneated on effects of aitric <br />acid; also menCioned newapaper clipping dealing with problem of propertq <br />devaluation. <br />Mr. B. Geisser, Carey Lane, asked when Planning Commf.ssian will discuas <br />ordinance referred to them. <br />Mr. West eaid the next Plauniag Cammissian is set tentativelq for December <br />lOth. Suggested gettiag in touch w3.th Glerk of Coimcfl who wouid have <br />information for him, regarding date and tentative Agenda.