Laserfiche WebLink
`Public Hearing Minutes of 10-19-70 <br />-2- <br />which as I understand is on the County Board for 1973. Our project can have <br />ready access to Stearns Road. Al1 utilities are available; we are building <br />our own sewer off sight through existing Parkstone, so that there will be no <br />use whatsoever of the sewer on Wellesley and other surrounding areas and no <br />burden on residential sewers. <br />Mr. Moss said Mr. Packer would explain the building, constructiQn, etc. <br />Mr. Packer had no formal presentation but said he would be happy to answer any <br />questions. <br />President 0'Neill then asked for comments from people opposed to Ord. 70-128. <br />Mr. Boehmer stated he had received an. important notice from Mr. and Mrs. Timothy <br />and Mr. McCroxxe and Mrs. McCrone and would like to have same read by the Clerk. <br />Mr. Boehmer said this notice was sent out to all residents in the area in regard <br />to this apartment house development. These are questions that the residents <br />would like answered. The Clerk read the attached notice, titled "Important To <br />You." <br />Mr. Boehmer said he would appreciate it if all of the questions could be answered <br />at this time. As representative of Ward 1, he believes that these people do have <br />good points and they should be answered. <br />President 0'Neill commented some of the questions were answered by the remarks of <br />Mr. Moss in his presentation; first of all, in that the streets going into Wellesley <br />Garden City allotment, would not be used during or after the constructian of the <br />project. President 0'Neill asked confirmation of this from Mr. Moss who said that <br />is correct. <br />Mr. Moss stated that Wellesley will not be used during or after construction for <br />ingress or egress. <br />Mr. West asked then why are we showing this part out on Wellesley? <br />Mr. Packer answered if you look at the plan we have here, our plan does not show <br />ingress or egress to Wellesley. It was in discussions with the Planning Commission <br />and the Fire Department that felt there should be some emergency provisions pro- <br />vided there. As far as we are concerned that land does not have to be rezon.ed. <br />We have no intention of using it as part of this development here. It does not <br />show on our plan at all. <br />Mr. West asked if it is their plan to take down the homes in there. Mr. Packer <br />said there are two vacant lots. <br />Mr. West said it should be made clear here exactly what is going to happen. He <br />asked Mayor Christman what was the Fire Department's intention on this if the <br />lots are unimproved - certainly, you cannot bring fire trucks in. <br />Mayor Christman said he believes this is at the request of the Fire Department, <br />feeling that one access into the 550 suites, should something happen that would <br />conceivably block the one entrance off Lorain Rd. they felt that somehow they <br />would have to have another way in there. Mayor Christman asked Mr. Packer is it <br />not the intention of the Fire Department to pave some sort of driveway? Mr. Packer <br />4D answered two strips of concrete could run over.