04/05/1977 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council Minutes of 4-5-77 -4- Mrs. Gladys Zipp, 29656 Lorain Rd., addressed Council with respect to Fire Station No. 2 regarding manpo~rer at the Station; para~asdic units being stationed at Fire Station No. 1; also it was her uadsrstaading at the time of the puxchase of the paramedic units the empower would be rescheduled so as to have one fully equipped unit at the east end and west end of the City. Lenghty discussion ensued.. Mr. Leonard Klucar, 6105 Decker Rd., addressed Council with respect to the house being built at corner of Decker & Southern Ave.; discussed Build#eg C~eissioner's interpretation and presented objections to the granting of the variance. Discussion ensued. Law Director Gareau discussed same. Mrs. Charlotte Klucar, 61Q5 Decker Rd., addressed Council with respect to the house to be built at corner of Decker Rd. b Southern Ave. and stated reasons for her objections. Mr. Wilamosky discussed subject matter. Law Director Gareau recapped subject. Discussion ensued. Mr. Earl Brennaa,4372 West Ranchview, addressed Council with respect to the Tallwood Estates subdivision; discussed'traffic and stated his ob~~ctions. Discussion ensued. Mr. Fairfield all factors with Law Director Gd~-eau. Mr. Arthur Sexton, 4396 Weat Ranchview, addressed Council regarding the rerouting of the gas line. Discussion ensued. Mr. Leo Hammer, Hampton Drive, addressed Council with respect to him having a copy of Ohio Revised Code. Mr. John Maloney, Arlington Lane, addressed Council with respect to a request sometime ago for a traffic light at West Ranchview & Lorain Rds. Discussion ensued. Mrs. Wylie, 4384 Ranchview Avenue, addressed Council with respect to access road; traffic problems, safety hazard and does not want thru traffic. Discussion ensued. LEGISLATION: President Pro Tem Beringer stated Council is aware that the Mayor has sent a letter to the Clerk of Council in regard to Ord. Na. 77-42: Clerk read following letter from Mayor (~ristman to the Clerk of Council: "I return Ord. No. 77-42 to you approved except for the following: 1) Section 3: Street Maintenance Fund: Delete List of streets and cost of resurfacing of said streets as shown on page 5-A in the amount of $82,876. (2) Remove from Lime Item: Labor - $41,438.00, Materials - $41,438,00. I veto the inclusion of the priority listing for the resurfacing of streets pecause establishing these priorities is an administrative act and not a legfsl$tfve act. I do not take exception to the fact that the streets so included are in definite need of resurfacing." Mr. Fairfield moved to reconsider No. 77-42 and override the Mayor's veto, seconded by Mr. Wilamosky. President Pro Tem Beringer asked Shall Oxd. No. 77-42 be adopted notwithstanding the veto of the Mayor. Mr. Beaty asked if there are not two motions on the floor at this time - one to reconsider and one to override. Law Director Gareau stated the Charter by its own dictates indicates Council must reconsider - dose not think you have to move to reconsider. The proper motion is what was read by President Pro Tem 5aringer. Mr. Fairfield stated he has seen Mayor Christman's veto and hie reasons for it: This pear for the first time we have a program to repair streets and set a schedule up for them. This hasn't been done before and rightly it may have upset the Mayor in this respect but thinks if we are going to be a