Laserfiche WebLink
" Council Minutes of 1/16/85 -3- <br />4) Every Council Member has received a copy of the Landmarks annual report. <br />Asked if the recently purchased typsariter would be paid out of 1984 budget <br />monies since it was requisitioned and purchased before the end of the year. <br />Mayor advised he had cut off all purchase orders during a period of time; it <br />came out of the temporary appropriation monies. Finance Director stated he <br />would look into this purchase and advise ~4rs. Petrigac about the funds used. <br />Mr. Tallon, Chairman Building, Zoning and Development Committee reported: <br />1) A brief BZD Committee meeting was held this evening to clear up a proposal <br />that was missed over the holidays. Mr. Tallon moved Council approve a proposal <br />by Adon Equipment Company, 23904 Lorain Road, to construct a storage building on <br />the rear of the property, as approved by ARB and Planning Commission, as well <br />as BZD Committee, second by Mr. Bierman, unanimously approved. <br />Mr. ?ailamosky, Chairman Finance Committee as well as Streets and Drainage Committee <br />reported: 1) Finance Committee met on January 14th with Mayor, Service Director, <br />Safety Director, Public Works Commissioner, Fire Chief VanKuren and Police Captain <br />Marsh in attendance. Discussed estimated costs with respect to a new chassis for <br />Rescue Squad 53 which shows about 62,000 miles on the odometer. Based on 1984 <br />figures, Squad 53 cost about $4.70 per mile for maintenance alone, primarily because <br />of the high mileage and wear and tear on the alternator and transmission and other <br />major components. Estimated cost for a new chassis is $30,000. Also discussed <br />was the purchase of a new defibrillator for Squad 53 at a cost of $7,000. The <br />estimated cost relating to five new police vehicles - four of which would be basic <br />control units; one a detective vehicle - was $81,000 according to ?fir. Petre's <br />estimate. Mr. Wilamosky noted that his figures from a previous meeting show an <br />estimated cost for this puchase to be $61,00 plus. Apparently the additional cost <br />will cover radio equipment and lights. Committee has no objection to moving ahead <br />with the purchase of safety equipment however the method of funding must be <br />established, whether through the general fund, through bonds or perhaps a combina- <br />tion of both. Two of the older police cars will be converted for auxiliary use and <br />the others will be traded in or sold at auction. <br />2) Committee also discussed the contents of the contract agreement Taith respect to <br />the FOP and requested the Mayor to furnish information as to what the cost of the <br />concessions would be to the City. Hopefully, will have this information within the <br />next week or so. <br />3) Committee discussed the possibility of creating two additional funds, .one of <br />which would be directrd at providing a vehicle for improving accountability where <br />there is a shared service, shared cooperation, between two departments. This <br />would provide a little mare accountability with respect to proper charges to the <br />departments receiving services. This needs some work with respect to the language <br />and there are some computer problems also to be solved. tlhat prompted the. need for <br />this additional fund was the work being done by the Service Department at the Rec <br />Complex in the last few months; how much was spent for labor, how much for material, <br />and who made the purchases; should it come out of the Rec Complex budget or the <br />Service Department budget. The other fund will provide a little better accountability <br />for services the City performs for other governmental entities such as Cleveland <br />Water Department, etc. tdhen there is a pay-back, Committee feels it should be kept <br />in a separate fund instead of being put into the general fund and the monies therefor <br />can be accountable. The mechanics of this fund are now being worked out. <br />4) Committee and the administration is very close to establishing a rate structure <br />for the sewer system, at least through 1990 or so. If the Mayor has not been in <br />communication with the City of Fairview and Olmsted Township, would ask that he do <br />so since they caill be a part of this system based on the terms of the EPA grant. <br />5) Community Improvement Corporation has received a request for funding for the <br />Carriage Carnet Company, Incorporated; interested Council P4embers are caelcome to <br />attend the CIC meeting on the 24th. <br /> <br />