My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/18/1989 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1989
>
04/18/1989 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 4:03:28 PM
Creation date
1/9/2014 4:05:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
4/18/1989
Year
1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• ~ . <br />_ Council Minutes of 4/18/89 -3- <br />Law Director Gareau reported: 1) With respect to Dingess versus the City of <br />North Olmsted, after the filing of numerous motions and setting up depositions, <br />etc., the plaintiff finally hired an attorney and the case was dismissed.. <br />2) In the matter of the Kostrek School Guard Case, Law Director has made appli- <br />cation to the Bureau of Employment Services to exclude that position and declare <br />it to be a summer, part-time employment - seasonal employment. Recently, a <br />Franklin County Court of Appeals ruled this way and consequently Mr. Gareau filed <br />an appeal with the Board of Review for another rehearing on the issue. He feels <br />it is a pretty good law and the city, in fact, can have that position declared <br />"seasonal" and therefore not subject to the payment of unemployment compensation. <br />Will keep council advised. <br />3) As indicated by the Mayor, a meeting was held regarding the EPA. Right around <br />the time the city was seeking its license, and the plant was being completed, the <br />Ohio EPA started coming up with new regulations dealing with cadmium and copper <br />content of the effluence that was being discharged into Rocky River; the standards <br />were being set up and the city was asked to reduce the copper level of the discharge <br />into Rocky River which is no different than the copper level of tap water coming <br />from the pipes in homes. There is no technology today to remove that copper. <br />Despite that fact, the Ohio EPA came up with this order after the city had spent <br />$13,000,000 for improvements to its Treatment Plant; basically, spending $3,000,000 <br />more to achieve something that is unachievable. City had basically appealed their <br />decision with respect to putting that requirement on its license; the appeal was <br />ignored and issued a license with those requirements. If the city fails to meet the <br />license requirements, it can be fined $25,000 a day for each portion of the permit <br />it is required to meet; the prospect of being fined on a daily basis is out- <br />rageous. Law Director has requested assistance from Squire, Sanders and Dempsey <br />because this is a specialized area and they have been working on it. C ity is now <br />ready to go into a hearing which will require employing an engineer to show that <br />the Ohio EPA abused its discretion. Law Director is working with Squire, Sanders <br />and Dempsey, the administration, Superintendent Harry Crider to put this all to- <br />gether. By the end of the week, should know how we stand and will come back to <br />council after making some decisions and advise just what is being done. Does not <br />believe the city can stand by; feels this is a winable case; Ohio EPA is already <br />starting to modify its requirements but if a city is already licensed, it is <br />caught in the middle and even if they change a little bit later on - the city is <br />still required to meet the license that was issued rather than the new require- <br />ments. <br />Finance Director Boyle reported: 1) Council is now considering three note issues <br />totalling $500,000, one of which pertains to traffic signalization. This may or <br />may not be acted on tomorrow at the special council meeting; council may decide <br />not to sell in 30 days. This is the 30 day referendum period; it must be done <br />correctly, in conjunction with the .Ohio Department of Transportation, or the <br />$138,000 for thirty-two signals will become the city's expense.. It would move <br />the signalization up one year but NOT be applied against the city's share so that <br />the city's total share would then become $276,000. The decision could be reversed <br />at a later time and may not be out for notes for $500,000. The notes will be one <br />year duration, maturing next year. Finance Director discussed with Finance Committee <br />about timing the notes differently and placing the city in a better position to go <br />to the bond market in a year or two. The short term note market right now is such <br />that it would be better to stay out for one year an:d position ourselves in 1990 or <br />1991. City would get a better rate if all its notes came due at the same time and <br />were converted to bonds. Finance Director has tried to do this over the past eight <br />years. Notes have been sized according to records and testimony of the department <br />heads and percentages applied to accommodate inflation, anticipated interest rates <br />and anticipated legal fees. There will probably be some extra money then, which <br />will help on paying them down next year; city will be able to arbitrage that money; <br />arbitrage being in investing the monies that the city is not spending. None of the <br />projects demand total payment on the 30th day afterlpedsagains WtheeSaadown.there <br />will be interest earnings on that which will be apP g p y <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.