Laserfiche WebLink
.' . ~ <br />Council Minutes of 2/6/89 -4- <br />b. Romp Plaza, Drug Mart, 24485 Lorain Road, proposal to construct <br />addition for retail and storage; revision to existing building and site plan. <br />This was a court settlement; the plan was approved by the court; no revisions <br />to the plan can be made other than lighting and drainage. After reviewing the <br />plans, committee requested that the existing light, at the rear of Danny Boys, <br />be shielded. The developer stated he had no problem with that and would <br />shield the light. Mr. Tallon moved council approve the Romp Plaza proposal <br />as above stated, second by Mr. Bohlmann, unanimously approved. <br />c. Buckeye Lanes, 24488 Lorain Road, presentation of parking lot lighting <br />plan; poles are installed. This presentation was brought to the BZD Committee <br />after the Building Commissioner .saw that the poles had been installed without <br />a permit being issued. Upon investigation, it was determined that CEI was in- <br />stalling the light and is not required to have a permit, however, the owner does <br />have to submit a lighting plan to the Planning Commission. Planning Commission <br />approved the plan after the owner agreed to shield the lights if there was any <br />glare or nuisance caused by them. Unfortunately, the committee has no control <br />over the esthetic development of lighting poles by CEI; they are ugly, wooden <br />poles stuck in the ground with lights sticking out on top of them. Committee <br />would like to address this problem to see if legislation could be enacted to <br />require an esthetically pleasing type of pole.. Mr. Tallon also reported that the <br />owner agreed to clean up the area and also to fix and maintain the cleanliness <br />as well as to take care of the fence. Mr. Tallon moved council approve the <br />Buckeye Lanes parking lot lighting plan, second by Mr. Bohlmann. Roll call on <br />motion: Aff irmative vote: Bahas, McKay, O'Grady, Tallon, Wilamosky. Negative <br />vote: Bohlmann. Abstained: Boehmer. 5 Aye - 1 Nay - 1 Abstention - Motion <br />carried. <br />d. Sohio Service Station, 29131 Lorain Road, proposal to construct <br />storage building, continued from December 13th meeting. This is basically a <br />small storage shed to protect snow blowers,. shovels, etc. and will also <br />enclose the dumpster. Mr. Tallon moved council approve the Sohio Service Station <br />proposal as above stated, second by Mr. O'Grady, unanimously approved. <br />e. Bentley/Coe Plaza, south side of Lorain Road, between Coe Avenue and <br />Bentley Drive, proposal to construct shopping center. Approved by ARB and <br />Planning Commission. Developer presented two plans: one plan included a rear <br />exit onto Bentley and the other one, Plan A-lA, which has two entrances on <br />Lorain Road - none on Bentley and Coe - was the plan approved by Planning Commission, <br />ARB and the BZD Committee. Mr. Tallon moved .council approve the Bentley/Coe <br />Plaza Plan A-lA, as above stated, second by Mr. Bohlmann, unanimously approved. <br />f. Plus Sizes, 26005 Great Northern Shopping Center, Number 12, proposal to <br />renovate front of unit. This is a minor exterior change to .the front of <br />Donlevy's Back Room, to clean up and present a more uniform look and to in- <br />corporate the Plus Size sign. Planning Commission unanimously approved and <br />BZD Committee concurred. Mr. Tallon moved council accept the Plus Sizes, reno- <br />vation proposal as above stated, second by Mr. Bohlmann, unanimously approved. <br />LEGISLATION: <br />Ordinance No. 86-92 introduced by Mayor Petrigac was given its first reading. <br />An ordinance amending Section 1213.04 of the Zoning Code of the .City of North <br />Olmsted entitled "Improvements of Parking Areas" of Chapter 1213 entitled <br />"Detailed Requirements", as amended. Mr. Tallon moved to table Ordinance No. <br />86-92, second by Mr. O'Grady, unanimously approved. Ordinance No. 86-92 <br />tabled. Mr. Wilamosky asked that the record reflect that the City Planner is <br />currently reviewing a section similar to this legislation and it will be dealt <br />with through his recommendations. <br />