Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 10/15/91 <br />Audience Participation (continued) <br />Pl'r: P!c'Kay commented t'Fiat our agreement is with the County; when a c:i.ty applies <br />for a sewer tie-in, the County grants that application.. The tie-in for OL~ted <br />Township will not cause a probl~n for the City; we are trying to plan ahead and <br />keep our plant updated for future use. <br />Mr. Nashar agreed that the City is planning for future expansion of the Treatment <br />Plant . <br />Mayor Boyle responded that, for the first time in many years, the plant is <br />operating below capacity. According to EPA figures, the plant is now at 75X <br />capacity, which is much more than 30,000 gallons. The contract sued with the <br />County several years ago, stipulated amounts of water acid sewage that could be <br />accepted from the County. Tt~ City exceeded that contract, and in 1990 fouand it <br />necessary to impose a tap-in ban on Olmsted Township. Due to the sewer work <br />being performed in the City, we have brought the plant's volume down to 75~ <br />of capacity. The City new feels duty bound to amend the contract to show the <br />exact amounts being received from the Township. The 30,000 ~l.lon figure is <br />rounded off and is much less than our capacity. It allows some leeway to the <br />Township to grant tap-ins to single homes and does not impact at all on the <br />development of North Olmsted or Fairview Park. <br />Mr. Leonard commented that when this proposal was originally brought up, he had <br />questions concerning capacities. He noted that the coamittee agreed to release <br />the tap-in ban for the 30,000 gallons; and, at the same time, authorized the <br />Mayor to enter into an agreement with an engineering firm to conduct a facilities <br />study. Ordinance No. 91-148, which is an first reading tonight, will give the <br />Mayor permission to enter into this agreement for the facility study. The City <br />is proceeding very slowly, step by step, so we do not over-reach plant capacity. <br />Donna McGreal, 5378 Wellesley Avenue, was very pleased to hear that the <br />legislation to limit the number of dogs had been tabled. She questioned whether <br />there was a more permanent method of withdrawing the legislation. Mrs. McGreal <br />was assured by Mr. Boehmer that the legislation was effectively "dead". <br />Dorothy Vormelker, 26b46 Sudbury Drive, also expressed concern about Ordinance <br />No. 91-139; she feels it will cause trouble between neighbors. <br />LEGISLATION <br />Or finance No. 91-125 introduced by Mr. Leonard and Mayor Boyle was given its <br />third reading. An ordinance establishing the organizational chart and compo- <br />sition of the Fire Department of the City of North Olmsted, and declaring an <br />emergency. Mr. Leonard moved for adoption; second by Mr. Lind; passed <br />unanimously. Ordinance No. 91-125 adopted. <br />Ordinance No. 91-127 introduced by Mr. Tallon was given its third reading. An <br />ordinance to make appropriations for current expenses a~xl other itures for <br />the City of North Olmsted for the year ending December 31, 1992. Mr. Tallon <br />moved for adoption; second by Mrs. Beringer; passed unanimously. Ordinance <br />No. 91-127 adopted. <br />3 <br />mmv~.vFY +nwl..-"-... ~ i. fB:.WC~ .+w~~aLtF-1~:24R~H~q <br />,. <br />.. ~. <br />