My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/03/1992 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1992
>
03/03/1992 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 4:03:58 PM
Creation date
1/9/2014 5:41:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
3/3/1992
Year
1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 3/3/92 <br />enterprise zone. This will be beneficial when applying for Issue 2 money for <br />drainage problems in the Clague Road area and for maintaining the infrastructure in <br />the Butternut area. <br />5) The Board of Control met on February 17 and approved Fabrizi Trucking for <br />concrete slab repair and catch basin repair. The bid was on a per-unit basis, <br />which lowers the cost. Fabrizi Trucking bid $207,000; the engineer's estiffite was <br />$247,800. In all there were 13 bidders, 6 of when were under the engineer's <br />estimate; all were on a permit basis. In addition, the practice of going out <br />for bids early in the year has resulted i.ri lower contract costs. <br />6) The Recreation Department will hold a children's Easter Egg Hunt on Sunday, <br />April 12. <br />Law Director Gareau reported: 1) Last week attended a conference ixi federal court <br />in front of the magistrate dealing with the Dingess case. This case involved a <br />resident who filed a ccxnplaint against the City claiming that his Character had <br />been maligned. We filed a motion to dismiss Mating that a cause of action had <br />not been established. In addition, wee asked for attorney's fees. A ccxnpromise <br />has been reached whereby, if ~ agree to withdraw the request for attorney's fees, <br />they will dismiss the ease. Therefore, this case should be resolved azxi dismissed <br />within the next 30 days. <br />2) The meeting in Chicago with the Environmental Protection Agency was very <br />successful. The EPA now urxlerstands that we are spending millions of dollars to <br />resolve a problem not si.~ly because we were mandx~ted to do so, but rather because <br />we thought it was the appropriate thing to dv. Because we found that sane <br />sewer laterals from homes were a source of our infiltration problem, the decision <br />to include them within the infrastructure of the city for one time was made. We <br />have noticed measurable results frown the work that has been done, aril. the EPA was <br />impressed because other cities have not made such a declaration and commitment. <br />All this will result in abetter ~rorking relationship with both the U. S. and Ohio <br />EPA. <br />3) Attended an arbitration hearing dealing with hospitalization for the Fire <br />Department. Briefs are now being prepared to assist the arbitrator in making a <br />decision. <br />Finance Director Burns reported: 1) On first reading tonight will be Ordinance <br />No. 92-25 which establishes a linked deposit program. Along with the Mayor, has <br />been in contact with various lending institutions to work out the practical <br />problems of establishing this program with regard to discrepancies between the <br />Ohio Revised Code and the federal consumer loan regulations. <br />2) Also an first reading is Ordinance No. 92-20, which should be passed under <br />suspension of the rules because it deals with Internal Revenue Service regulations <br />that become effective March 1. Those regulations require that any money spent for <br />a capital project prior to the issuance of the debt to pay for that project must <br />have had. in place a document called a "declaration of official intent" 30 days <br />prior to the spending of that money in order for that money to be considered spent <br />from the borrowing. The effect of this is that, should the doct~nent not be in <br />place, the money is considered never spent out of the borrowing. That money is <br />then forever subject to the rebate rules of the Internal Revenue Service which <br />require any interest that is made in excess of the interest paid on the debt to be <br />paid to the Internal Revenue Service. Ordinance No. 92-20 establishes the process, <br />requirements, and responsibilities for the "declaration of official intent." <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.