My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/01/2011 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
03/01/2011 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 4:06:53 PM
Creation date
1/13/2014 5:43:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
3/1/2011
Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 03-01-2011 <br />Resolution 2011-31 was introduced and placed on first reading by Council Member <br />Orlowski on behalf of himself and Council members Kearney, Mahoney, Williamson and <br />Brossard. A Resolution opposing and discouraging the state legislatures' support of <br />Senate Bill 5's attack on organized labor, and declaring an emergency. Councilman <br />Orlowski made a motion to suspend the rule requiring three readings and formal <br />committee review. The motion was seconded by Councilman Kearney. Roll Call: <br />Orlowski, yes; Kearney, yes; Mahoney, yes; Schumann, abstain; Williamson, yes; <br />Barker, no; Brossard, yes. Motion to suspend rule requiring three readings and formal <br />committee review passes 5-2. <br />Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane said this is one of the most misunderstood Senate <br />Bills that he's read in a long time. The fact is he opposes Senate Bill 5 because he is a <br />tax payer and does not want to see binding arbitration leave the table with the Taft- <br />Hartley Law still intact; allowing organized labor to go directly to court and get decisions <br />from a judge that normally would be established in a binding arbitration environment. It <br />will hurt every tax payer in the State of Ohio. If an administration of any organization <br />has the power of the employer, the balance of power is different; the judge will be more <br />apt to award attorneys fees if the State loses the case to labor. Senator Grindell, a <br />Republican, has already said that this will create a litigation nightmare for the State. This <br />does affect North Olmsted directly. <br />Councilman Orlowski moved for adoption. The motion was seconded by Councilman <br />Kearney. Roll Call: Orlowski, yes with comment. SBS is not just an assault on <br />organized employees, it is an assault on the middle class which organized labor helped to <br />create. This bill will lead to a reduction in wages and benefits to middle class employees. <br />Their net take home pay will be reduced through larger co-pays on retirement and health <br />insurance benefits. Issues which affect the bargaining units will also affect all non- <br />bargaining employees and middle management employees. The middle class is the <br />largest group of tax paying individuals in the country -the same group of people who <br />keep the economy moving by purchasing automobiles, clothes, essentials and paying <br />taxes. Since North Olmsted is a retail Mecca, the fallout from this type of mean-spirited <br />legislation may affect and harm our City more than most other cities. Roll Call <br />continued: Kearney, yes; Brossard, yes; Barker, no with comment. Number one, most of <br />the people in the audience know my history on votes on Resolutions. Number two, as <br />Mr. Groden has mentioned, it's not a completed Bill. Number three, I have heard neither <br />pros nor cons from any residents of Ward 2 except for tonight. My vote is no. Roll Call <br />continued: Mahoney, yes with comment. Local governments and legislators frequently <br />testify before the General Assembly. Different types of organizations frequently testify <br />before the General Assembly. Congress has legislative hearings where all they do is take <br />testimony as to the merit to propose legislation before the U.S. Congress. The Senate <br />holds hearings on legislation all of the time. In my professional life, I know there were <br />many hearings on the Adam Walsh Act, Amber Alert System and the clean air and <br />cleaning up our lakes had hearings also. I really don't see this Resolution or any <br />Resolution that we pass or don't pass on a particular issue as a way for local governments <br />and legislators to weigh in on subjects like this. I don't have a problem with passing <br />Resolutions on things that are of importance and particularly because this is important to <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.