Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 7/5/94 <br />and consumed in the park for this celebration. One of the issues beffig discussed <br />regarding this legislation was that the Labor Day celebration would be a good tel. It <br />seemed to be an acceptable idea. ffNorth Olmsted were to renege on their comet at <br />this point, it would probably m the cancellation of Labor Day festivi~es for Cuyahoga <br />County. As a compromise solution, the Mayor suggested that the le~gialation be art~ndexl <br />beginning at the bottom of page one with the words, "....building, public park or <br />playground." He sugge~e+tl that it be c~aagecl to read, "....builc~g, and sons-time basis <br />in North Olmsted Municipal Park ffi c~jimction with Labor Day cele~ats to be held <br />on September 3, 1994, sponsored. by the Ckweland Federation of Labor AFL-CIO. The <br />Council of the City of North Olm~ed ratty permit the sale and consumpt~ of alcoholic <br />beverages in municipal buildidgs and on said one occasion provided that:". The r er <br />of the wording would be the same. In addition to this amendment, reslxisrtions have been <br />drawn up that will limit the area for sale and consumption of alcoho~c beverages. The <br />designated area will not include the playground and will have set-backs from the roads and <br />parking areas. In response to a question by Mrs. Babas, the Mayor that the word <br />"celebrations" should be saugular. Althou~ Council will have the a rity to institute <br />other restrictions, the Mayor notes that restrictions would inchtde the ticrn that food <br />will be served at all times that beer is being served, beer wig be served in a conta~er <br />identifiable as containrag beer, ao minors wdl be allowed ~ the designated area, and no <br />one drinking beer will be allowed out of the area. Mrs. Babas asked Law Director Gateau <br />whether this one-time case would set a precedent. Mr. Gateau answered that Council <br />would have the authority to great another request if they chose to do so. However, they <br />would not have to do so. Mayor Boyle commented that, if that is a concern and since the <br />Charter is the prevailing law in the city, he would have no problem with the issue leg <br />presented to the Charter Review Commission. If the Commission chose to present this <br />issue for a vote of the gear public for inclusion in the Charter and h was passed, then <br />the possibility of it happe~g again would be eliminated. Once it is in the Charter, no <br />Council can change it. <br />Law Director Gateau reported: 1) With regard to the case of Fox vs. the City of North <br />Olmsted, a motion for summary judgment was filed. Notification was received today that <br />the plaintiff has vohmtarily dismissed the case. <br />2) The final draft of the Elia~a Jeeen~gs brief should be filed whhm the next two weeks. <br />3) A civil rights lawsuit has been file~cl against the city dealing with a police officer who <br />claims his civil rights were violated because of an inspection that took place prior to his <br />being made a permanent Civil Service employee. <br />4) As the Mayor indicated, a meeting was held with the attorneys representing the owners <br />of Springvale. It will now be possible to fill in the blanks of the contract with regard to <br />the attached exhibits. This should be accomplished before the final reading and passage of <br />the legislation. The clog will probably take place at the end of the year. <br />Finance Director Burns reported: 1) Ordinance 94-107 has been added to the agenda <br />tonight. This $400,000 note ordinance for the Recreation Codex has been discussed in <br />the Finance Committee. Special meetings will be held on Wednesday, July 6, and <br />2 <br />