My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/15/1995 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1995
>
08/15/1995 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:41:20 AM
Creation date
1/9/2014 9:18:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
8/15/1995
Year
1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 8/15/95 <br />Finance Director Burns: 1) Recently the city made application for Issue 2 money under <br />the loan assistance program Awards have been made to all applicants at 62.4% of the <br />amount requested. This program pays interest costs for current and previous year <br />projects. For the 1994 projects, we reque~ed $346,000 and will receive $216,000. For <br />1993 projects, we requested $168,000 and will receive $105,000. <br />2) Last week a payment of $175,000 was made to the EPA in settlem~t of the fine that <br />had been assessed. The payment was made from the sewer revenue fiord and the city will <br />have to borrow to replace the fonds by year's .end. We have three options: One, go out <br />to the general public and sell notes. This would involve the preparation of another official <br />statement and all the related costs. Second, the city's underwriter can make a private <br />placement, which would not have the cost of the official statement but the underwriter <br />would charge a fee. The underwriter has indicated that a private placement is pole. <br />Third, the city could buy the notes as an investment. This would require earmarking <br />$175,000 that could be locked away for an extended period of time because refinancing <br />would not be poss~'ble until we go to bond next year, probably in June. Money from <br />street and sewer projects m~ht be available for this option. Since a decision must be <br />made shortly, he will ask bond counsel to prepare an authorization, using the second and <br />third options, for the Finance Committee's consideration. <br />3) Ordinance 95-110, the 1996 budget, must be passed by September 15 and delivered to <br />the County Auditor by Septe~er 20. The budget shows general fund revenues of <br />$14,594,000, which is approximately a 3% increase over 1995's projected revenue for that <br />fund. The millage that the city is al~wed to assess for debt service on the sewer debt <br />incurred prior to 1987 will increase by approximately two tenths of a mill. <br />Mrs. Saringer, Chairperson of the Building, Zoning and Development Committee: 1) The <br />committee met on August 9 will all members present and Council M+an~ers Mr71er and <br />Musial, Building Commissioner Conway and City Engineer Deichmann. Agenda items <br />were as follows: <br />a. Proposal to construct McCormick Place Shopping Center, 23130-23150 Lorain Road. <br />In attendance were George Papandreas, Sheldon Gross an architect with Applebrook <br />Design and Bob Brehmer from Levin Furniture. The proposal was approved by ARB on <br />July 19 and the Planning Commission on July 25. There will be three units on this <br />property: Morris Graphics, Levin Furniture, Sears Hardware and Garden Center. All <br />suggestions made to the BZD Committee were addressed and agreed upon. The manager <br />of Clague Towers is agreeable on extending the board on board stockade fence. The <br />drainage and retention on the property will meet or exceed the city's requirements. <br />However, drawings are needed which reflect the changes in this area with regard to <br />retention, sewers and drainage. Mrs. Saringer moved to approve with all the <br />recommendations of the ARB and Planning Commission and contingent upon the <br />approved engineering plans, making sure that the Engineering Department carefully <br />reviews the plans because of the flooding problems in the area; second by Mr. Nas~har. <br />Mr. Musial commented that there had been extensive discussions with regard to the worm <br />water retention and, as he understands it, the peak rates of runoff after development <br />should be no greater than 90% of the peak rates occurring before any development. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.