Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 3/7/95 <br />~;-„, 1988 and 1989, the city was operating under a permit that was inappropriate because of <br />~- needed improvements at the plant. The EPA did give the city grants to fix the problems, <br />however, we were still required to maintain the permit limits. It took four years to fight <br />that issue before the Environmental Board of Review in Cohunbus. The permit was <br />amended, but it was only in existence for six months. We are now operating under a new <br />permit, but we do not yet know the permit limits. The potential fine for all these issues <br />dating back to 1988 was $38 million. Since 1990, the city has taken a very aggressive <br />stand and has spent millions of dollars in order to eliminate infiltration and inflow into the <br />sewer system The U. S. and Rio EPA have taken notice of these efforts and have met <br />with the city to resolve the issues. The Mayor, Law Director and Service Director have <br />met with the U. S. Attorney's office on numerous occasions to negotiate the best possible <br />agreement under the circumstances. Through these negotiations, the fine to be paid by the <br />city has been set at $175,000. <br />2) The city and the Building Commissioner were recently named in a lawsuit involving a <br />spelling driveway. The cement had been supplied by Medina Supply and the work done <br />by a private contractor. The Law Director contacted the attorney and threatened to file a <br />Rule 11 for frivolous conduct because the city has immunity in such cases. The pleadings <br />were amended and the city and the Building Commissioner are no longer a part of the <br />case. <br />3) The Robinson Civil Service case began today and will continue for the remainder of the <br />week. <br />4) In the Eliza Jennings case, the Court of Appeals upheld the lower court and granted <br />the city the original $106,000 but refused to allow interest back to the date of the <br />Supreme Court ruling. Instead, the interest will be calculated from the date that Judge <br />Gaul entered the opinion, which was about a year ago. The amount of principal and <br />interest will be approximately $117,000. <br />With regard to Mr. Gareau's report on the waste treatment plant, Mr. Nashar wondered <br />how long the city would be able to maintain the plant without putting too great a tax <br />burden on the residents. He questioned whether the city should investigate another <br />system, such as the Regional Sewer District. Mr. Gareau said that we have no alternative <br />but to maintain the plant. The same permit limits would have to be met no matter who is <br />running the plant. In addition, the plant is presently running very smoothly; and we are <br />doing an excellent job with respect to overflows, by-passes and meeting the permit limits. <br />Mayor Boyle commented that an engineer from Malcolm Pirnie would address the sewer <br />rates at the committee meeting on Wednesday. The Mayor said he felt the last rate in the <br />proposed ordinance would probably take us to the end of the decade. The city has <br />explored other alternatives, such as joining the Regional Sewer District and privatizing the <br />plant. However, the city has made changes in procedures and staff and invested capital in <br />the plant to bring it to its present state. As a matter of fact, an engineer from one of the <br />private firms stated that the plant cannot be run any more efficiently than it's being run <br />right now. Mr. Gareau explained that the Regional Sewer District would have no use for <br />our treatment plant and would simply use it as a lift station to pump into their main <br />interceptor. The cost of the main interceptor would become a real problem Although the <br />plant would only be used as a lift station, all of the debt associated with the improvements <br />3 <br /> <br />