My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/02/1997 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1997
>
09/02/1997 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:41:43 AM
Creation date
1/9/2014 10:12:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
9/2/1997
Year
1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 9/2/97 <br />for office space, are now valued at $1,172,000. It should be noted that this brings in <br />about $15,525 of additional taxes to the schools. <br />5) Recently a new phone system was installed in City Hall which allows people to call in <br />seven days a week, 24 hours a day. During closed hours, the caller can leave voice mail <br />messages. Since the system was installed, we have received 3,000 messages at an average <br />45 seconds per message. This amounts to 37 1/2 hours of additional input from residents-- <br />all of which we have responded to. <br />6) The Great Lakes Initiative as currently set up focuses on a chemical standard and a <br />way of reducing mercury levels within an effluent that the city does not believe is efficient. <br />We cannot meet those standards right now, and we believe it would cost $40 to $60 <br />million to meet that level. Our case has been presented to the U. S. EPA. We have been <br />using more of a biological standard--testing the waters downstream and upstream in the <br />Rocky River and into the lake. We have recently been informed by the U. S. EPA that <br />they are not going to change our limits. Since we have achieved their goals by use of a <br />biological standard, the Great Lakes Initiative will be reviewed based on the outcomes <br />achieved by the City of North Olmsted, among other cities, and the State of Ohio. This <br />may bring about changes to the GLI. Our city is now leading the way in cleaning up the <br />Great Lakes--this is a long way to come for a city that was being fined $38 million eight <br />years ago for dumping sanitary sewage in the streets. City Council played a big part in <br />this turn-around by standing firm on the rates and allowing the administration to do the <br />work required. <br />7) Recently a resident of Ward 4 complained to Councilman McKay about the number of <br />buses on Fitch Road. The facts on this issue are as follows: There are two routes that <br />travel Fitch Road, one being the #89. The #89 is asuburb-to-suburb route which ties in <br />North Royalton, Strongsville, Berea, Olmsted Falls, Olmsted Township and North <br />Olmsted and ends at Great Northern Shopping Center. We had this route years ago, but it <br />was dropped by RTA. We struggled to get it back. It is basically a daytime service from <br />8 a.m. to 9 p.m., with 25 trips per day and 16 trips on weekends. This route helps our <br />peak-to-base ratio considerably, keeping us solvent. The numbers for this route have been <br />steadily increasing, and it now services 715 riders. The second route on Fitch Road is the <br />#64 Flyer, which dates back to the early 1960's. This route makes 6 rush hour trips and <br />services 825 citizens. The total of 31 trips per day on Fitch Road services over 1,500 <br />citizens and is a valuable commodity to the city. The resident also asked if the buses could <br />be switched over to Columbia Road. First of all, that switch would not service the same <br />people. Secondly, Columbia Road is serviced by 34 buses daily. These routes are doing <br />exactly what we want: servicing the people in that area and North Olmsted on a daily <br />basis. The buses are handicapped equipped, and the mid-day service is mainly seniors. <br />These routes are valuable to the city. <br />Law Director Gareau: 1) Regarding the case of Fox vs. the City of North Olmsted, the <br />Law Director had filed a Rule 11 and was granted an award of $2,100 against Mr. Fox's <br />attorney for frivolous conduct. Because the lawyer wasn't a party to the suit, we have <br />filed a nunc pro tunc order with the court asking that he be made a party to it so that the <br />city can collect the $2,100 judgment awarded by the court. <br />,~. <br />,,,~, <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.