Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 6/17/97 <br />utility services on behalf of the residents. Presently, utilities have protected service areas. <br />However, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio has created a pilot project for electric <br />deregulation known as conjunctive electric service. Deregulation will provide for "retail <br />wheeling" whereby retail users will be able to choose power suppliers as is currently done <br />with telephone long-distance suppliers. Under the PUCO program, users could combine <br />and negotiate for more favorable rates. The intent of this ordinance is to offer a Charter <br />amendment to the citizens of North Olmsted which would allow the city to negotiate with <br />utility providers on behalf of all of our residents so as to take advantage of these reduced <br />rates. Numerous suggestions and concerns were voiced at the meeting, including <br />questioning whether a Charter amendment was the best way to accomplish this objective. <br />The administration requested that the legislation be withdrawn to allow for additional time <br />to review various options. The committee concurred with that recommendation. <br />b. Resolution No. 97-53, which reaffirms that the City Council and the Mayor support the <br />Community Development Block Grant Program and ask that Congress continue to fund it. <br />The committee unanimously recommended approval of the legislation. <br />c. Resolution No. 97-58, which calls upon CEI to conclude bargaining with Utility <br />Workers Local 270 so as to preserve jobs in our community and to achieve improved <br />maintenance and emergency response. The legislation was introduced by the Mayor. <br />Following some discussion, the committee unanimously recommended approval of the <br />legislation. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Donna Marshall, 4692 Canterbury Road, spoke on the height of fences around swimming <br />pools. Mrs. Marshall does have a four foot fence around her yard However, according to <br />the current regulations, she would need to add a two foot fence at the top of a four foot <br />pool. She feels it would be an imposition to pay the extra cost for the two foot fence. <br />Mr. O'Grady explained that Council is currently reviewing the swimming pool barrier <br />requirements. He recently introduced legislation which will require residents to have a <br />four foot barrier and leave it to their discretion to go to six feet. A four foot above- <br />ground pool will not require another barrier as long as there is a controlled entrance. It <br />was explained to Mrs. Marshall that the legislation will not be in place for this summer <br />season and that she should contact the Building Department to determine whether her <br />current fence has been in place long enough to be "grandfathered" under the law. <br />LEGISLATION <br />Resolution No. 97-37 introduced by Mr. Nashar on behalf of Mayor Boyle, Mr. Limpert <br />and himself was given its third reading. A resolution requesting a review by the State <br />Legislature of Ohio Revised Code 4303.29 as amended, effective November 1, 1994, <br />subject to economic development project and defining specific limitations. Mr. Nashar <br />moved for adoption; second by Mr. Limpert; motion passed unanimously. Resolution <br />No. 97-37 adopted. <br /> <br />4 <br />