Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 8/4/98 <br />y which shall be incorporated into the proposal for landscaping and screening purposes. <br />All other landscaping shall remain in place as designated on the plan. <br />3. Ground lighting shall be incorporated into the proposal for the area between the fence <br />on the southern property line and the southernmost portion of the parking lot. The <br />lighting is presently absent, and this area contained no lighting provision. As the <br />developer indicated, there would be a significant dark portion back there. The lights <br />contemplated will be 3 to 4 foot in height and shall be aimed toward the ground and <br />building. There should be no more than 3 foot candles at the building. The lighting <br />scheme is subject to the approval of the Building Department. <br />4. There shall be no outside storage of any clothing or materials on the site. Any and all <br />drop-offs that are there for the purpose of Goodwill shall be stored indoors. <br />5. If a nuisance is determined to exist in the opinion of the Building Commissioner due to <br />exterior drop-offs after the normal hours of business, Retail Today agrees, and <br />proposed this themselves, to install bollards and chain to serve as a barrier to the <br />southernmost rear portion of the parking lot to prevent vehicular traffic from <br />proceeding to that portion of the lot and dropping off materials. That is the area in the <br />past where we have received the most amount of drop-offs--directly behind the <br />building at the southernmost portion of the lot. <br />6. The satisfaction of the requirements and conditions as set forth by BZD would have to <br />be met and satisfied prior to permit issuance. <br />The committee unanimously recommended approval of the project subject to those <br />conditions. Mr. Gareau moved for approval of the Retail Today proposal subject to the <br />above conditions and also all conditions and recommendations of the various boards and <br />commissions. The motion was seconded by Mr. McKay and unanimously approved. <br />b. Baker's Square, 24025 Lorain Road. The proposal consists of exterior reimaging, <br />lighting and signage. Mr. Forester represented Baker's Square. The proposal for Baker's <br />Square calls for replacing the existing clay the roof with a new standing metal roof; <br />incorporating a new dormer on the front side of the building facing Lorain Road to allow <br />for wall signage on the front of the store; painting the building and adding accent lights; <br />replacing the pole sign with a ground sign and adding a light pole to the north side of the <br />lot to improve the lighting in the front of the building as well as improve the lighting at the <br />rear through the addition of lighting heads. Mr. McKay informed the committee that <br />Baker's Square had made contact with neighboring residents to address their questions <br />and concerns. There were no objections raised by the residents at the BZD Committee <br />meeting. It was noted that considerable input was taken by Baker's Square at the <br />previous Planning Commission meetings to incorporate suggestions that would be more <br />neighbor friendly to the residents in the area. After discussing the matter, the committee <br />unanimously recommended approval subject to the recommendations of the boards and <br />commissions of the city. Mr. Gareau moved to approve the proposal of Baker's Square <br />subject to all recommendations of the boards and commissions. The motion was seconded <br />by Mr. Miller and unanimously approved. <br />5 <br />~.~.,,..F,. ,~_., _.,.,,. .,.. ._. , <br />