Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 8/17/99 <br />with which businesses would be limited in the amount of glare that could proceed off <br />the property, distances from appropriate horizontal foot candles and a provision, <br />which was the most controversial, regarding the height limitation on poles upon <br />which lights would be located. Further concerns expressed were the cost of removing <br />non-conforming light poles, the input of the police and safety forces as to what <br />impact less lighting would potentially have on commercial properties, the need for <br />illumination to protect properties, the efficiency that comes with less light poles and <br />less lights, the feasibility of shielding lights as opposed to removing them all together <br />and the potential for significant modification of display areas and the cost that would <br />go with that. The committee agreed that additional input was needed and agreed to <br />hold 99-77 and 99-79 in committee for further review. <br />• Ordinance 99-102, an ordinance amending Section 1363.07 of Chapter 1363 of the <br />Real Property Maintenance Code entitled `Duties and Responsibilities of Owners and <br />Operators' so as to require owners and operators of commercial premises to maintain <br />and when necessary replace trees, shrubs and other plantings which are part of a <br />landscape plan approved by the city. The committee discussed the necessity of <br />requiring property owners to adhere to landscape plans that have been approved by <br />the city boards and commissions. These plans frequently require landscaping for <br />buffering purposes. However, there are occasions when the owners do initially meet <br />the landscaping plan as approved but will then let the landscaping die, never to be <br />replaced. Therefore, the purpose with which it was originally intended, that being <br />buffering (of noise or light), is no longer in place. Ordinance 99-102 will require <br />property owners to maintain approved landscape plans, which would include <br />replacing components that should perish for whatever reason. There was one <br />amendment to the ordinance which was simply a substitution of "shrubs" for "bush" <br />which is simply in conformity with the rest of the code. After discussion, the <br />committee unanimously recommended approval of Ordinance 99-102. <br />• A review of Ordinance 99-100, which creates new Chapter 1369 of the Building Code <br />of the City of North Olmsted entitled `Fences and Screen Walls' for the purpose of <br />standardizing fence construction in the City of North Olmsted particularly as applied <br />to residential neighborhoods in order to promote good neighborly relations in <br />neighborhoods. The committee discussed the fact that, although North Olmsted <br />allows fences in residential and commercial districts, there are presently no provisions <br />in the code regulating the types of materials to be used and the styles of fences to be <br />constructed. The result has been a varying number of materials and fences and kind <br />of a hodge-podge network that has come up throughout the community. This <br />ordinance will establish those standards. Upon review and discussion, the committee <br />unanimously recommended approval of Ordinance 99-100 with a minor amendment <br />concerning the requirement that fences which contain sharpened points will have to <br />blunted for safety purposes. The committee unanimously recommended approval. <br />• Motorcars Chrysler Plymouth, 24500 Lorain Road, with a proposal consisting of <br />using aself-contained modular office on an existing car lot. Representing Motorcars <br />was Mr. Garrett Murray, an attorney, and Mr. Nick Abraham, the owner of the <br />Motorcars group. Motorcars seeks to use a 40 foot by I 1 by 11 foot 9 inch modular <br />unit on the southeastern portion of the current lot which is just east of Porter Road for <br />~"'"' the purpose of a sales staging area. The unit as proposed initially was gray vinyl <br />6 <br />