Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 5/5/99 <br />designated landmark district: the Butternut Ridge Road historical district, which is <br />;~ demarcated by signs along the road. The process created by Ordinance 99-40 is intended <br />to provide for greater administrative oversight to proposals involving historic landmarks <br />or historic landmarks districts. As the system is set up right now, once the City of North <br />Olmsted goes through the administrative process to designate something a landmark, it <br />ends and it can be demolished as though any other building could be demolished. This <br />new and revised landmarks ordinance is simply a process by which the Landmarks <br />Commission can review the proposal to demolish. They will not stop it. However, they <br />can give their insight as to perhaps efforts to preserve the building as it exists or perhaps <br />give insight as to what building will be replacing it. There is no intention on the part of <br />Council or the Landmarks Commission to permanently require someone to maintain a <br />building that is a landmark. It simply provides an opportunity to step back from the <br />proposal and to get a disinterested set of eyes, the eyes of the Landmarks Commission, to <br />review the proposal to see to it that the building and modifications best fit the <br />neighborhood that it is in. After discussion by several of the committee members as well <br />as the Landmarks Commission, which offered great insight to the proposal, the <br />committee unanimously recommended approval of Ordinance 99-40. The ordinance will <br />be passed under suspension of the rule this evening. <br />Mr. McKay, chairperson of the Streets & Drainage Committee, noted that, when he <br />passed Cedar Point Road hill this evening, it looked like the construction workers were <br />completing that project and the road should be open. <br />Mr. Nashar, chairperson of the Public Safety, Health & Welfare Committee: 1) The <br />committee met on April 26. Present were committee members Miller, Gareau and <br />Nashar; Council members McKay and Limpert; Safety Director Jenkins. The committee <br />discussed Ordinance 99-50, which is an ordinance creating a new Section of 537.19 of <br />Chapter 537 of the General Offenses Code entitled "Offenses Against Persons" so as to <br />prohibit the pointing of laser devices at persons or animals. Laser pointers are mainly <br />used for classroom and business presentations, but now have become a popular fade <br />among the children. According to our Police Department, laser pointers are a growing <br />problem especially if the laser is pointed at an officer. A laser could cause damage to the <br />retina of the eye and temporary blindness to a person or an animal. The city schools <br />prohibit students from bringing laser pointers into the building. The committee amended <br />Ordinance 99-50 to prohibit the sale of laser pointers to persons under the age of 18. Mr. <br />Nashar asked Dr. James Kershaw to come forward and give a presentation on laser <br />pointers. <br />Dr. James Kershaw, O.D.: <br />• Lasers are the brightest source of light created by man. A 1 mW laser pointer is <br />1,000,000 times brighter than a 100 watt light bulb. <br />• Although it is unlikely, laser pointers can cause permanent damage to the eye. When <br />a laser is directed at the eye, it reflexively closes within. 0.24 seconds. Current over- <br />the-counter (less than SmW) lasers do not place enough energy on the retina in that <br />amount of time to destroy retinal tissue. Permanent harm will result after 3 to 5 <br />seconds of continuous viewing. Only two anecdotal cases have been reported (FDA <br />~:z~~ <br />.,~.. w~..,,a ,~.,.._,, ~.~,~, _..:.,., .._ <br />