Laserfiche WebLink
.~:<, .,, <br />Council Minutes of 12/19!00 <br />,~,, December 18 in Eastlake and Brecksville respectively. At the same time, North <br />r Olmsted held a meeting this evening for the same purpose, and it was quite well <br />attended. It should be noted that consumers are considered to be in the program, <br />unless they choose to exercise their option to opt-out. This ordinance was the follow- <br />up of the established agreement to join the coalition of governments which was <br />established to seek lower electricity costs for residents. Although there is no <br />guarantee of that, it is our best effort at achieving that. The ordinance was <br />unanimously recommended for approval. <br />• Ordinance 2000-117. There were additional attendees at this particular part of the <br />meeting including the Safety Director, the Finance Director, Mr. Ellis of AT&T and <br />Mr. Dunn of Ameritech. Ordinance 2000-117 has been amended to a significant part <br />to reflect that the enforcement of the violation of cell phone use would be a secondary <br />offense. This means that officers would not cite a person using a cell phone, which in <br />terms of the ordinance is dialing, answering, listening, talking on a hand-held <br />telephone, unless they are being cited for another offense, such as a moving violation. <br />Much discussion was held on this amendment. The ordinance has, in fact, been <br />discussed on several occasions and the ordinance in general was discussed two or <br />three times in committee. The ordinance addresses only hand-held phones. Two <br />Council members voiced their objection to regulating cell phones at all while others, <br />who were initially skeptical of complete regulation, felt comfortable with the idea that <br />a resident would not be stopped simply for use of the cell phone, but instead would <br />now be cited for use only if they were stopped for another violation. It was <br />established that the City of Brooklyn ordinance regarding cell phones has not been <br />challenged as yet. Tentatively it was established that, although there is an inattentive <br />driver statute on the books that potentially covers cell phone misuse, having <br />Ordinance 2000-117 on the books would not jeopardize the affect or enforceability of <br />either that ordinance or the existing applicable but general ordinance. The legislation, <br />as thrice amended, was unanimously recommended for approval by the committee. <br />2) The Mayor has asked Council to approve several commission appointments, two of <br />which are reappointments: <br />• Adolph Spagnuolo has been recommended for reappointment to the Fair Housing <br />Board for a term commencing January 1, 2001 and ending December 31, 2003. Mrs. <br />Kasler moved that Council reappoint Adolph Spagnuolo to the Fair Housing Board <br />for the term of January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2003. The motion was <br />seconded by Mr. Miller and unanimously approved. <br />• Karin Shultz has been recommended for reappointment to the Architectural Review <br />Board for the term commencing January 1, 2001 and ending December 31, 2002. <br />Mr. Kasler moved that Council reappoint Karin Schultz to the ARB for the term of <br />January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002. The motion was seconded by Mr. <br />Nashar and unanimously approved. <br />• Jacgi Templeton has been recommended for appointment to an existing open term on <br />the Fair Housing Board which began on January 1, 1999 and ends on December 31, <br />2001. Jacgi has lived in North Olmsted for 27 years, raised her family here and was <br />the former Westlife reporter covering municipal activities in our city. She has served <br />3 <br />