Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing <br />Ordinance No. 99-83 <br />"~' looking at a parking lot. The noise, the wear and tear on the street, which is not a street <br />that is built for that, would destroy the beauty of the street, and it is one of North <br />Olmsted's oldest and prettiest. She is already concerned with the traffic problems that <br />will occur with the CVS building that is being constructed. She has talked to many of her <br />neighbors who were not able to be here tonight, but they are united against this <br />proposition. <br />Tim Pacsuta, 5244 Dewey Road, is concerned about the lights. Right now, there are <br />approximately five lights that are not shining downward and reflect on about four houses <br />on Dewey Road. This issue should be addressed. He is concerned about the size of the <br />proposed mounding. Also, the width of the street is an issue because it is not wide <br />enough for two cars to pass. There aze problems with the residents being able to pull out <br />onto Lorain Road, These are just several issues that will impact the neighborhood. He <br />understands there have to be changes in life, but there are certain issues that should have <br />to be well looked into when considering the residents. <br />Henry Caster, 27501 Butternut Ridge Road, asked if Halleen owned the property on the <br />opposite side of the comer. (The gas station.) Councilman Gazeau said Mr. Halleen did <br />not own that property. Mr. Caster wondered what would stop the owner of that property <br />from asking for like zoning. He thinks its unfair to properties on the west side to be left <br />out of the zoning as those properties would probably increase in value as commercial. <br />George Correll, spoke on behalf of his mother who lives at 5170 Dewey Road. The street <br />will not support commercial traffic. Also, the current drainage is inadequate. The <br />neighborhood as a whole is opposed to the rezoning. <br />Councilman Gateau said, as author of the ordinance, he would like to explain his <br />thoughts behind the legislation. He represents the best interest of the whole community. <br />The origin of this proposal goes back about two years and also involves the CVS <br />property. About two or two and a half years ago, a proposal for a Walgreens was made <br />for the property where the CVS is now being constructed. In his opinion, the plans were <br />atrocious. At that point in time, Council began to look at how that corner could be saved <br />because the building was private property and the owner had the right to pull it down. A <br />dialogue began with the property owners about ways to use that area as a springboazd to <br />how the west end of town would be developed. Also, discussions were had with Mr. <br />Halleen about his proposal and idea to build a dealership in the area. It was discussed <br />with Mr. Halleen about what he could do to revitalize the entire corner including <br />buildings that were there that had not been taken care of over the years. The concept was <br />to push it toward Lorain Road, as was done across the street, and to put the building as <br />close to the road as possible to remove the possibilities that it would be up against <br />residential properties. The original concept was to try to do a styling consistent with an <br />older type of architecture because of the Butternut Ridge historical district across the <br />street. If this rezoning does not go forward, there will be no project. There have been <br />discussions about mounding and lighting. Planning Commission recommended a six foot <br />mound with a six foot board-on-board fence on the top. The BZD Committee thought it <br />3 <br />