My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/06/2000 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
06/06/2000 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:45:24 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 9:50:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
6/6/2000
Year
2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 6/6/2000 <br />misinformation along with the attacks. Part of that misinformation was that people <br />were being closed out, and that's not the case. If the ordinance had gone through, it <br />didn't mean that there is 90% union and 10% non-union and aII of a sudden every <br />contract in the city is going to be union. It's not that at all--it meant that on the one or <br />two contracts a year that are big enough (that always have been union anyway), we <br />would have extra protections. It was never his intent to close anyone out and he <br />wouldn't do that. It was his intent to safeguard the best interests of the residents. <br />Gemma Szabo, 30837 Bradley Road <br />• She wants to know why Council would add more to the city's debt of $62 million. <br />She said that there are a lot of places to put ball fields on vacant land the city owns. <br />There is land right by the Rec Center. Why are she and her neighbors bothered all the <br />time? She has been living there 49 years, and every time something has to be built it <br />comes down there. The house the city wants to buy has a 13 foot hole in the <br />backyard. She doesn't understand it, and wishes someone would explain it to her. <br />This has made one of the neighbors sick. Why does the city want to do this to their <br />lives? Mayor Musial said he has gone through this several times and the primary <br />reason for purchasing this land is to preserve green space in the city for the future <br />residents. Mrs. Szabo said, if the city didn't have a $62 million debt, she would say <br />yes go ahead and buy. Mayor Musial answered, following that philosophy, we <br />shouldn't be spending any money at all and we can't do that. We have streets to <br />repair, we have improvements at the Rec Center. He thinks that green space is <br />necessary too. The question has been asked: How much is this going to cost the <br />residents? It's going to cost the residents roughly $2 a year for 20 years, based upon <br />11,000 home sites in the city. Actual cost to the average resident is very, very low. <br />Mr. Miller said he certainly hopes this comes back into committee for further <br />discussion. He asked if the $2 figure includes just purchasing the property? Mayor <br />Musial said, "correct." Mr. Miller then noted it doesn't include leveling the land to a <br />playable level instead of a 13 foot hole, it doesn't include clearing the property, it <br />doesn't include opening the roadways in the area to make them more accessible. It's a <br />real, real limited least amount situation and the money has to be borrowed to do it. <br />Mayor Musial said the question was how much was it going to cost to purchase the <br />land, and he gave the answer. Mr. Miller said the shape of the land is basically a <br />bowling alley. He thinks the Mayor's figures only reflect that which would allow it to <br />continue on as a bird sanctuary. We've got Bradley park right around the corner. As <br />Mrs. Szabo and Mrs. Blankenburg mentioned, the city has needs right now that. If <br />we have property and we have needs, we should be placing those needs with the <br />property we currently have. If we need to borrow money, certainly it will be less than <br />what we are looking at now. Who knows in 10 years what the financial situation of <br />the city will be. Who knows if the city will ever acquire the other pieces. There are <br />so many problems with this. <br />Marty Sammon, 6539 MacKenzie Road <br />• He has been a resident for 12 years, and for the last 10 years he has flooded. <br />Everybody knows about it, but nothing seems to get done. He can't see spending <br />$300,000 for a piece of property when the property around there isn't worth it. Why <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.