Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 3/21/2000 <br />Jenkins, Fire Chief Ed Bak, Police officer Steve Wolf, and Assistant City Engineer <br />,,~; Griffith. There was only one item on the agenda that evening and that was a discussion <br />of a traffic preemption system which would regulate traffic control lights in such a <br />fashion that, when an equipped emergency vehicle approaches an intersection with lights <br />and sirens flashing, the traffic signal would go red in all directions but the direction in <br />which the vehicle was approaching from. In other words, there would be three red lights <br />and one green and traffic would still move in the direction in which the emergency <br />vehicle was approaching. Of course, the traffic would have to yield to the emergency <br />vehicle. But the concept was that the intersection would be cleared. City Engineer <br />Griffith explained the system and how it works. He also explained the technology has <br />been around for approximately 25 to 30 years. One type of system that has developed <br />over the years is a sound activated system. The other system which has become more <br />aggressive lately is the light activated system where there is a beam that is emitted from <br />the vehicle as it approaches and that triggers the light. The distance can actually be <br />controlled. There were pros and cons with each individual system. Once the vehicle <br />approaches the intersection and proceeds through, the signalization would take anywhere <br />from a minute to a minute and a half to revert back to its normal cycle. Assistant <br />Engineer Griffith believed that was somewhat of a drawback. Benefits that were <br />discussed were the possibility of increased response time, increased awareness for the <br />drivers within the city and the benefit that comes with advance notice when an <br />emergency vehicle approaches an intersection. Another possible drawback was cost. Mr. <br />Griffith believes the cost could be up to half a million dollars. We have several different <br />needs in the city at this point in time. And while it certainly would be a benefit to the <br />city, we would want to give particular attention to some of the other concerns we have <br />with our safety forces--vehicles and things along those lines. Another concern expressed <br />by the Chief was the possibility that people would still disregard it. The funding could <br />include a grant. However, the grant applications are running four to five years behind for <br />this type of a system. A video presentation of the systems was presented and the <br />committee agreed that it was an interesting concept. It certainly is something that should <br />be explored in the future. However, at this point in time with some of the other needs <br />that we have, it would have to take its place in line with the others. One thing that was <br />brought up was the possibility that, because our squads leave the city and go to other <br />communities, perhaps we should look at it from a joint effort with other communities to <br />do the same type of system so that each unit would be equipped no matter where it was <br />on the west side of Cleveland. Other communities around here have tried these systems, <br />and some are still expanding on it. This was just a discussion and the committee made no <br />recommendations. <br />Mr. Nashar, chairperson of the Building, Zoning and Development Committee: 1) The <br />BZD meeting was held on March 14. Present were committee members Gareau, O'Grady <br />and Nashar; Councilpersons McKay, Limpert, Kasler; Law Director Gareau; Building <br />Commissioner Dave Conway; approximately 24 representatives from the Chamber of <br />Commerce. Agenda items were as follows: <br />• Ordinance 2000-23, introduced by Councilmen Gareau and Nashar. This is an <br />~^ ordinance creating new Chapter 1719 of the Business Regulation Code of the City of <br />,~;; <br />5 <br /> <br />