Laserfiche WebLink
Counci[ Minutes of 9/18/2001 <br />developed have now turned into potholes. He is concerned because he hasn't hear a word <br />about that stretch of road. The city is going to spend a million dollars or more on the <br />intersection of Claque and Lorain, but it will end at a briaz patch of berms that have not <br />been maintained and that fill with water every time it rains and a roadway that is not <br />acceptable. He and many people in the ward believe they have been punished far not <br />accepting the $6 million new roadway that was proposed several years ago. He believes <br />it is ridiculous to spend $1 million on an intersection and not have a decent roadway <br />adjoining it. Also, the city promised to do the culverts on Lessner Road two years ago <br />and it has not been done. <br />President Saringer said that she consistently asks about the resurfacing of south Claque <br />Road. As recently as last week, she asked Mr. Bohlmann about it. She asked why it <br />could not be included in the Issue 2 legislation. Service Director Bohlmann answered <br />that Claque Road had been looked at to some degree. It was felt the city's chances were <br />better with the four projects that were chosen because the $6 million grant was turned <br />down several years ago and members of the county staff are on the Issue 2 staff and they <br />remember that. The projects chosen for the Issue 2 application include: Lorain Road, <br />due to the fact that the state is going to repave in 2003 and the city would like to put new <br />curbs in; Butternut Ridge Road, which has some significant and terrible drainage <br />problems; Grace Road because there are some sanitary problems that still affect residents <br />and there are some sever storm problems; Great Northern Boulevard, which has a great <br />amount of traffic, the approach ramps southbound and westbound need work and the <br />island tops are in a disastrous condition. North Claque Road is going to be repaved in <br />2003. We would like to rebuild the intersection first and perhaps sometime next yeaz or <br />the year after ask Council to do some engineering services to look at the alternative for <br />Claque Road-whether it should be three or fow lanes, and whether the curve should be <br />straightened out. The city feh those other four streets had some higher priorities than <br />south Claque Road even though we recognize the fact that there's a significant amount of <br />traffic there. If need be, another skin coat can be put down to hold it together. <br />President Saringer said she would urge the Council, and specifically the Streets & <br />Drainage Committee, to take Claque Road into consideration. She does not believe the <br />residents will consent to a four-lane highway which would permit truck traffic. We <br />should pursue this as a three-lane road. Mr. Limpert, chairperson of Streets & Drainage, <br />said he would look into the issue <br />Councilman McKay commented that he was the chairperson of Streets & Drainage at that <br />time. The residents came and expressed very vehemently that they did not warrt a four- <br />iane road. He explained to them that the city did not have the money to repair that street <br />the way it should be and did not know at any time in the future when we would have the <br />money. It was their choice to accept the road as it was rather than have afour-lane road <br />and the curve straightened. The county at that time was very unhappy. A number of <br />years prior to that, Council had with open arms accepted the widening of that road. 5o he <br />can understand why the county will not put any more money into it. We turned them <br />down once, and they are not going to come back and offer us money again, especially <br />when there are so many streets to be repaired throughout the county. <br />9 <br />1 <br />