My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/17/2001 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2001
>
07/17/2001 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:45:38 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 10:25:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
7/17/2001
Year
2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 7/17/41 <br />then relaxes these restrictions farther from the crosswalk. Traffic Engineer Griffith <br />provided a diagram which showed that afull-time ban on parking will exist 60 feet to <br />the west of the crosswalk and 70 feet to the east of the crosswalk. During the hours <br />that young children aze arriving and leaving the school, the restriction will cover 120 <br />feet in both directions. Minor editorial changes were proposed for this ordinance, and <br />those changes have been incorporated irno the latest version. With no other changes <br />recommended, the committee unanimously recommended passage under suspension <br />of the rules. <br />• Ordinance 2001-89, which creates a new Section 557.06 of the General Offenses <br />Code entitled, "Possession and Use of Cigazettes and Other Tobacco Products by <br />Minors Prohibited," in order to locally prohibit such conduct by minors in accordance <br />with the recently enacted Senate Bill 218. Assistarn Human Resources Director Chris <br />Allegra mernioned that this law is supported by state law. This ordinance will <br />generate no additional paperwork for the police officers enforcing it, and it has the <br />support of the North Olmsted City Schools. In fact, at North Olmsted High School, <br />this law is being incorporated into their school behavior codes. The first offense of <br />smoking by a minor on school grounds would be handled by the school. The second <br />offense would be referred to this program. The third offense would be handled under <br />the provisions of state law. In response to a question, Ms. Allegra commerned that, as <br />with all pieces of legislation, this one too could be subject to legal challenges. But <br />since it mirrors state law, it can be expected that this legislation would hold up in <br />court. The committee voted to withhold recommendation on this ordinance pending <br />answer to two questions: First, does the idea of referring a minor to Youth Diversion <br />Program need to be mentioned in the text of the new Section 557.06 of the city code? <br />Second, would it be legally permissible and is the North Olmsted Police Department <br />interested in having the ability to detain suspects under this code? As written, the <br />state and city codes expressly prohibit a police officer from detaining a suspect. The <br />committee decided to discuss the ordinance again on July 17 to review the answers to <br />these questions and make a recommendation. <br />2) The committee met on July 17. Present were committee members O'Grady and <br />Limpert; Council members McKay and Dailey; Safety Director Jenkins, Assistant Law <br />Director Dubelko, Assistant Human Resources Director Allega. Agenda items were as <br />follows: <br />• Ordinance 2001-89, which creates a new Section 557.06 of the General Offenses <br />Code of the City of North Olmsted entitled, `p'ossession and Use of Cigazettes and <br />Other Tobacco Products by Minors Prohibited," in order to locally prohibit such <br />conduct by minors in accordance with recently enacted Senate Bill 218. Responses <br />were provided to the questions asked on July 10. First, with regard to the requirement <br />to mention the Youth Diversion Program in the text of 557.06, the Law Department <br />deferred the question to the Human Resources Department, and Assistant Director <br />Chris Allegra stated that, since the Youth Diversion Program is in no other piece of <br />legislation, it is therefore not needed to be listed in this one. Second, with regard to <br />the idea of providing additional power to police officers to detain suspects, the Law <br />""' Department again deferred this question to the Chief of Police to see if he is <br />4 <br />R <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.