My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/08/2002 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
05/08/2002 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:46:02 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 11:05:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
5/8/2002
Year
2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 5/8/2002 <br />out that 100 or 300 holes have to be put in, quite obviously the geothermal system is not <br />applicable. It will not work properly, and it will be too expensive. The only way to <br />ascertain which is the best way to go, whether it's one utilizing duct work in the building <br />or pipe work, is by getting basic information. This is a scientific, academic approach at <br />this point in time to get data that enables us to make an intelligent decision. Mr. Lambert <br />reiterated that the city is only obligated to give a conventional heating and cooling <br />system. That's basically a gas fired furnace above ground and a cooling unit on the roof. <br />The cost information can be obtained from any one of a dozen heating and cooling <br />dealers in the city. An ordinance is not needed. Boring holes in the ground can be done <br />outside of a brand new building anywhere if they want to do it. The city has to give them <br />a building, but does not have to put tables and chairs in it. As with most projects, it's <br />going to be difficult to do this project within budget. Let the library board decide if they <br />want to pay for the boring and then present those figures to the city at a later time. It can <br />be incorporated into the plans anywhere along the way. The city does not need to go that <br />extra mile. Mr. Gareau commented that he looks forward to receiving from the <br />azchitects, at some later date, an analysis of cost of the proposed geothermal system <br />versus the conventional HVAC system. Mr. Lambert brought up a point in caucus which <br />was very perceptive, that being the city supplies the building and the systems which may <br />be more expensive up from in order to save the library money later on. It's a good point, <br />and he hopes at some point in the future Council is apprised of the cost equation and how <br />they compare. Mr. Miller said he too was concerned about what Mr. Lambert referred <br />to as bells and whistles. We need also to remember that the residents agreed to tax <br />themselves for a library and not necessarily bells and whistles. Council should be taking <br />a close look at items that are not necessary; for example, a gazebo. We want to build <br />bricks and mortar in that building and not take money away from it. If funds are left <br />over, we should have them in reserve for anything necessary that might occur shortly <br />after building. Further, he would ask that the Landmarks Commission also be brought in <br />to look at the plans formally and give their input on the entire library plan. Law Director <br />Dubelko said he wished to comment on Mr. Lambert's comment that we only have an <br />obligation to provide them with a conventional heating system. That just simply isn't <br />true. This Council approved the original cooperation agreement with the comity. There's <br />nothing carved in stone one way or the other. Our obligation through the construction <br />process is to secure the library's approval every step along the way for everything we do <br />in constructing it. That's the way it was presented, that's the way it was approved. So <br />the city cannot unilaterally simply say that no, we're not going to have geothermal. We <br />have an obligation to explore it with the couirty library system and make a determination <br />of what we're going to approve. It's a difficult issue and, in order for the city to act <br />legally and appropriately, we have to explore it. Mayor Musial said one of the interesting <br />aspects of the arrangement that we aze currently involved in with the library is that it <br />demands cooperation as a true partnership every step of the way. Part of that partnership <br />forces us to look at all of these options to make these determinations. Without basic, <br />scientific data, you cannot make an intelligem decision. Of course, we are going to make <br />an analysis between the two systems. If it's close, then our partnership agreement <br />indicates that we should go through with it. But we don't know that. With regards to Mr. <br />Miller's comments about the Landmarks Commission being brought into the picture, an <br />open public session with regazds to the plans and specifications regarding the library was <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.