My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/02/2003 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
12/02/2003 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:46:09 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 4:00:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
12/2/2003
Year
2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 12/2/2003 <br />Amendment case involving police knock and announce. He will provide details for <br />anyone who expresses interest. <br />Finance Director Copfer: 1) The RITA collections through the November collection, <br />which is the end of October receipts, are l.l% over prior year. An increase of 1% was <br />anticipated because of the opening of Dillard's and the mall expansion. <br />2) Last year, Council passed a sanitary sewer credit to be issued to people who used less <br />than 1 MCF in a quarter. She was assured that the Cleveland Division of Water was on <br />board to provide this information electronically. The cost for the credits was estimated to <br />be about a hundred thousand dollars. Dennis Long had worked with the Cleveland <br />Division of Water on this issue. The reality has not been quite that easy. The Finance <br />Department requested information several times in order to use an electronic process so <br />that the residents could get a credit on their sewer bill rather than the Finance Department <br />issuing checks. The Excel file that was sent was reviewed. There were accounts coded <br />"dummy" accounrts, deleted accounts, abandoned homes that still had sewer hook-ups. <br />There were duplicate billings. There were homes that were in repossession. They had <br />just dumped all the information onto one Excel spreadsheet. Some of the accounts were <br />not valid. If the information was used as sent, the cost would have been over three <br />hundred thousand dollars. At this point, through work and review of the data, the amount <br />to be paid out is about one hundred and sixty-four thousand dollars, which is higher that <br />what had been projected. Because she did not have confidence in the information, she <br />asked for a report and received a very lengthy report that is knee-high and in no particular <br />order. The data must be tested to insure it is more accurate. Because of all these <br />procedural problems, she could not meet the November date for credits but will have it <br />ready for the next billing cycle. <br />3) An update on Springvale, the revenue year-to-date is approximately $974,500 for the <br />golf, and it had been projected at $950,000. The ballroom is at $354,410, and $400,000 <br />had been projected. She is awaiting information on December revenues, but it looks like <br />$90,000 will be sufficient to cover the shortfall. The exact information will be available <br />before Council votes on the last transfer ordinance for the year. <br />4) Council's reports for the month of October were placed in mailboxes this evening. <br />The General Fund revenue is 1.69% below last year. However, when compared to what <br />we estimated as our resources, we have collected $8% of what we expected to. Real <br />estate and personal property taxes do come in chunks at certain times during the year and <br />there is one settlement yet to be made in November. We are ahead of where we should <br />be. Also, the expenses are 4.36% below last year. The department heads are really <br />monitoring their expenses. She is projecting approximately a five hundred to six hundred <br />thousand dollar carry-over from the results through October. <br />Councilman Nashar asked how many residents might be eligible for a sewer fund credit. <br />Finance Director Copfer said she did not have the exact information with her but guessed <br />it would be between four and five hundred customers. Councilman Gareau asked the <br />Finance Director whether there had been any discussion with the Wastewater Treatment <br />Plant and Service Department as to whether or not the city can economically continue <br />with the program if the cost is double or triple what had been anticipated. Finance <br />Director Copfer said she had not discussed this issue with anyone but Council and her <br />~s~ ~k ~~,.~~ <br />_, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.