Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 8/19/2003 <br />began doing business from their .current locations so that the time line for tax <br />abatements can be determined <br />Charles Dial, 27959 Gardenia, has noticed that the city recently put up a web-cam <br />covering the progress on the new library. What was the cost? Mayor Musial said there is <br />no cost to the city as the library is paying for it. <br />Don Pangrac, 23470 Sharon Drive, <br />^ Asked if the city has an ordinance regarding go-karts and electric scooters? <br />Youngsters are riding these vehicles in the middle of Sharon Drive at very busy <br />traffic times during the day. Mrs. Kasler answered that she had occasion to talk to <br />one of the police officers who recommended that we look into that. She has <br />discussed with Mr. Dubelko the possibly of creating an ordinance similar to the ones <br />regulating mopeds. With regard to safety issues, there are ordinances regulating that. <br />President O'Grady suggested that Mr. Pangrac contact the police when he sees <br />behavior that is unsafe. <br />^ The state recently passed a law regarding signage which will now have to be readable <br />from 200 feet. In the past, he has talked about making the lettering larger on city <br />signs. This will now have to be done. <br />^ He noted that he did not hear anything about Lorain County having problems with <br />their water system during the recent electrical power outage. Had we pursued this <br />years ago and tied into Lorain County, we would not have had a boil situation in this <br />community. He hopes the city is moving forward on that issue. <br />^ Awhile ago, he asked the Law Director about placing a surcharge on work performed <br />by the city for property owners who do not maintain their properties. Law Director <br />Dubelko said he did not have a definitive answer and does not know that he can <br />provide one. He has thought about it, and his gut feeling is that it can't be done. He <br />has some due process concerns about it. If the city was in the grass cutting business <br />and offered it as a service, certainly we could charge what anybody else could charge. <br />But, if we do it as part of an enforcement of high grass violation of laws, then there <br />are due process concerns in doing it at a profit. He believes that most probably <br />whatever charge or whatever cost we charge has to have a correlation with our labor <br />costs, etc. If he had to advise the city today, he would say don't do it and simply <br />continue making sure that we cover our costs. When we act in a governmental <br />capacity, he is fairly sure we can't act at a profit. It raises all kinds of concerns. <br />When we act in a proprietary capacity, offering something that the private sector <br />offers, then we could get into profit making. It was an interesting proposal, but he <br />doesn't think it will go anywhere. <br />Paul Barker, 23629 Carnage Lane, regarding cell tower revenue, asked if that isn't <br />supposed to go toward parks and recreation. Mr. Limpert said he did not believe so. On <br />an individual basis, that may have been done. For example, the tower at Claque Road <br />went toward recreation. Mrs. Kasler agreed that each tower was done separately by <br />ordinance. Mr. Miller noted the issue of the cul-de-sac on Root Road was discussed at <br />the committee meeting. It's very possible that the company putting in the cell tower may <br />be asked to put in the cul-de-sac. There are different thoughts out there as to what we <br />13 <br />