Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes 6I1712flfl3 <br />with regazd to preserving that property as opposed to having it turned into a parking lot? <br />Law Director Dubelko said the issue is being looked at currently in the Law Department. <br />Assistant Law Director O'Malley is working with the Clerk of Commissions and the <br />Building Commissioner on that issue of determining whether or not this building falls <br />within the landmazks district. If it does fall within, then the Building Commissioner has <br />an obligation before issuing the demolition permit to refer it to the Landmazks <br />Commission for their process. Their process results in a delay. It doesn't result in a <br />prohibition against demolition, but it's a delaying process that attempts to encourage <br />alternate use of the property. Mrs. Kasler asked whether the process that is being <br />investigated now with regard to the status of the property will be addressed prior to any <br />permits being granted. Law Director Dubelko said that was what the Law Department <br />was trying to do. They are in contact with the Building Department to insure that the <br />permit does not get issued until they resolve the issue of location. Mr. Nashaz said he <br />believed that a few years ago the Landmazks Commission had a map indicating that on <br />the north side of Lorain Road, the only building that was in the historical district was <br />Rebecca's store. Mr. Gareau said he believed there was a map affixed to the moratorium <br />ordinances that he introduced a couple years ago setting forth and delineating more <br />cleazly the historical district of North Olmsted. <br />Landmazks Commission member Paul Barker came forward and thanked the Mayor for <br />verifying that the foundations stones are available and thanked Mr. Dailey for his report. <br />The commission was concerned about the location of the stones and believe they will <br />improve the library when the stones are used azound the sign. Regazding Mr. Halleen, <br />they had a meeting with him in July of 2000 regazding his Kia dealership. Some pointed <br />questions were asked of him, and in particular he was asked whether he was going to <br />destroy any other buildings. He said no. The commission accepted the fact that the first <br />medical building in North Olmsted was torn down. Mr. Halleen said he was going to <br />renovate the buildings behind the dealership, and one of them was the old Ziebart <br />building which was the first car dealership in North Olmsted, D. B. & Elliott. Mr. <br />Halleen said he wasn't going to teaz that down. A permit was applied for, and the <br />building is gone. The commission picked up rumors about Rebecca's, and that also was <br />discussed when Mr. Halleen came to them and he was afraid his whole property was in a <br />historical district. According to the maps they have, Rebecca's is in the historical district. <br />Although the building isn't plagued, it is in the historical district and it should fall under <br />the Landmarks Commission. The commission does not have the authority to tell Mr. <br />Halleen he can't teaz it down, but they would like the city to consider persuading Mr. <br />Halleen not to do so. Although no question was brought up about the building on Porter <br />Road and it is not in the historical district, he believes it should have been discussed <br />because of the age concept and the history of it. The Landmazks Commission is <br />concerned, and they would stress to all boazds and commissions to look at Rebecca's <br />building very, very cazefully. They cannot make Mr. Halleen plaque the building. Mr. <br />Gareau's legislation of a couple yeazs ago regarding Landmarks will help stall the <br />process. Hopefully, if variances are needed, they will not be granted so that the building <br />cannot be torn down. <br />11 <br />