Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes 6/17/20(13 <br />,,~,. Councilman Nashar, member of the Streets & Drainage Committee, reported for <br />chairperson Limpert: 1) The Streets & Drainage Committee met on June 10. Present <br />were committee members Miller, Nashar and chairman Limpert; President of Council <br />O'Grady and Council members McKay, Kasler, Gareau; Mayor Musial, Law Director <br />Dubelko, Safety Director Jesse, Personnel Director Farver, City Engineer Durbin. This <br />was afollow-up to a meeting discussing Ordinance 2003-86, an ordinance which will <br />amend Sections 927.4, 927.5, 927.7 and 927.8 of the Streets & Utilities Code. The <br />purpose of this legislation was to change the code to match the federal EPA's desire to <br />encourage above-ground water detention and retention. For years, the city has <br />discouraged above-ground retention. If this is to be changed, the ordinance must be clear <br />to those wanting above-ground storage to make the above-ground retention and detention <br />called for in Ordinance 2003-86 to mirror city building codes regarding fences around <br />such bodies of water. Mr. Durbin helped the committee determine Section 927.7 would <br />be the best place by adding a subsection "D" refemng to the verbiage in 1345 in this <br />legislation. There is a great deal of concern by the committee about detaining water on <br />parking lot surfaces. The EPA is recommending that the retention system now be <br />presently stored above ground and in the parking lot to hold water anywhere from 45 <br />minutes up to an hour before it goes back down. Along discussion over this issue <br />ensued. If this improves drainage difficulties, it could be a good thing. But as the <br />committee read it in Ordinance 2003-86, it simply moves the storage above ground and <br />does nothing but make storage cheaper rather than better. The committee is not pleased. <br />If the city moves to this above-ground storage, it would be preferable to hold more water <br />on the property longer. Questions developed over whether these EPA regulations must <br />be implemented or if home rule applies. It is the desire of the committee to have the <br />administration take this back and try to re-work it or recommend to the committee to <br />stand pat on the current standards. The committee unanimously decided to put this back <br />to the administration, Engineering Department and Law Department for review. <br />Councilwoman Kasler, chairperson of the Public Safety, Health & Welfare Committee: <br />1) On June 10, the Safety Committee met. Present were committee members, other <br />Council members, the Finance, Safety, Law and Personnel Directors. Two issues were <br />discussed: <br />^ Ordinance 2003-91, an ordinance amending Section 141.01 of the Administrative <br />Code entitled "Dog Warden" in order to clarify the duties of the city's animal warden <br />and declaring an emergency. The ordinance does exactly that-it clarifies the duties <br />and establishes the appointing authority for that particular position. The committee is <br />awaiting an accompanying ordinance which will get into job description for that <br />particular position. The committee unanimously recommended approval of Ordinance <br />2003-91. <br />^ A liquor license transfer from what was Mt. Jack's to Dillon's Restaurant on Great <br />Northern Blvd. Without any police objection or any other concerns, the committee <br />recommended no objection by Council for the transfer for this liquor license. <br />Councilwoman Kasler moved that Council have no objection to the liquor license <br />transfer from Mt. Jack's Restaurant to Dillon's Restaurant on Great Northern <br />9 <br />.,,K.,~. ~.., _ <br />i. <br />