My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/03/2003 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
06/03/2003 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:46:19 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 4:00:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
6/3/2003
Year
2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 6/3/2003 <br />some blockage of view, the city will approach the homeowners to discuss appropriate <br />measurers to assure not only pedestrian and driver view, but even more importantly the <br />safe use that relates to our emergency vehicles passing through that area. <br />^ The damaged roof at Fire Station No. 2. Much discussion took place regazding the need <br />for a new station and that various irreparable conditions exist such as the inability to <br />house certain equipment due to the height of the building, quarters aze extremely limited <br />and the building has other significant repair needs. Replacing the roof, however, is <br />considered by the committee to be an urgent necessity. The discussion then went to <br />recommendations for a flat roof. It is the committee's initial concern that a hip or gable <br />roof is a better choice. However, the administration must weigh 1) whether a new fire <br />station is imminent and therefore a less expensive flat roof would be sufficient; 2) <br />whether a gable roof is necessary if a new fire station cannot be built in the near future; 3) <br />the cost and funding source for a roof. After much discussion and review of flat roof <br />proposals, the administration stated the following: 1) They anticipate the ability to build <br />a new station within the next few years; 2) There is $30,000 available in the fire station <br />budget to both complete the flat roof and make other repairs to the building. It is the <br />opinion of the City Engineer that this flat roof would be sufficient for five to seven years, <br />and it has a fifteen year limited warranty. Also, there is a ten year warranty of some <br />nature as far as workmanship is concerned. There has been progress on this issue which <br />will be evident tonight. The committee requested that the administration obtain accurate <br />quotes for a gabled roof, that Council remain apprised of recommendations and that this <br />process be expedited in order to repair an emergency situation. <br />^ Damage to the Springvale parking lot. At an earlier meeting, she questioned the damage <br />to the newly paved lot. Her concern was regazding who was responsible for the damage <br />and should a contractor be responsible for costs to repair that damage. After requesting <br />review by the Law Department and Safety Department, she received a response from the <br />Safety Dept. which stated that, due to a shortage of funds, the contractor was told to stop <br />work prior to the job being completed. Although this stoppage may affect the liability of <br />the contractor for damages, the situation raised many more questions. Requests were <br />made for the history of the parking lot and the committee wants to know when and why a <br />contractor was asked to leave a job, how much money was the city short in performing <br />that contract, did the work stoppage jeopardize in any way the integrity of future work on <br />the lot and/or the warranty provided by the first contractor, was the city penalized in any <br />way for not allowing work to continue? Council further requested a timeline for past and <br />future parking lot work and a full explanation of this situation. The information was <br />received this evening, but she hasn't had an opportunity to review it with regard to a <br />timeline for future work on this lot. <br />^ A city-wide emergency warning system. Councilman McKay brought to the committee's <br />attention that at one time the city had a siren system. This system was researched, and it <br />was determined by the Fire Dept. that the system that was put into place during or after <br />WW II was manually operated at the station and is no longer functioning. Presently with <br />the changes that have taken place in our Bowing city, it would no longer be sufficient <br />even if it were working. It is the opinion of the Fire Chief that, even with today's <br />technology, our city would require 12 sirens at a cost of twelve to fifteen thousand dollars <br />apiece. Although this system is still being researched and an emergency warning system <br />is being considered, Councilman Miller made a recommendation that the city might want <br />to consider that, when negotiating cell tower locations, an emergency warning system <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.